Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can we achieve better recruitment by providing better information? Meta-analysis of 'studies within a trial' (SWATs) of optimised participant information sheets.
Madurasinghe, Vichithranie W; Bower, Peter; Eldridge, Sandra; Collier, David; Graffy, Jonathan; Treweek, Shaun; Knapp, Peter; Parker, Adwoa; Rick, Jo; Salisbury, Chris; Man, Mei See; Torgerson, David; Sheridan, Rebecca; Sullivan, Frank; Cockayne, Sarah; Dack, Charlotte.
Afiliação
  • Madurasinghe VW; Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7L, UK.
  • Bower P; NIHR School for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. peter.bower@manchester.ac.uk.
  • Eldridge S; Centre for Clinical Trials and Methodology, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK.
  • Collier D; Barts NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
  • Graffy J; Arbury Road Surgery 114, Arbury Road, Cambridge, CB4 2JG, UK.
  • Treweek S; Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Room 306, 3rd Floor, Health Sciences Building Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
  • Knapp P; Department of Health Sciences, University of York & the Hull York Medical School, York, UK.
  • Parker A; York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
  • Rick J; National Institute of Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
  • Salisbury C; Centre for Academic Primary Care, Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
  • Man MS; Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
  • Torgerson D; Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
  • Sheridan R; Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
  • Sullivan F; University of St. Andrews North Haugh, St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9T, UK.
  • Cockayne S; Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
  • Dack C; Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
BMC Med ; 19(1): 218, 2021 09 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34551765
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The information given to people considering taking part in a trial needs to be easy to understand if those people are to become, and then remain, trial participants. However, there is a tension between providing comprehensive information and providing information that is comprehensible. User-testing is one method of developing better participant information, and there is evidence that user-tested information is better at informing participants about key issues relating to trials. However, it is not clear if user-testing also leads to changes in the rates of recruitment in trials, compared to standard trial information. As part of a programme of research, we embedded 'studies within a trial' (SWATs) across multiple ongoing trials to see if user-tested materials led to better rates of recruitment.

METHODS:

Seven 'host' trials included a SWAT evaluation and randomised their participants to receive routine information sheets generated by the research teams, or information sheets optimised through user-testing. We collected data on trial recruitment and analysed the results across these trials using random effects meta-analysis, with the primary outcome defined as the proportion of participants randomised in a host trial following an invitation to take part.

RESULTS:

Six SWATs (n=27,805) provided data on recruitment. Optimised participant information sheets likely result in little or no difference in recruitment rates (7.2% versus 6.8%, pooled odds ratio = 1.03, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.19, p-value = 0.63, I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Participant information sheets developed through user testing did not improve recruitment rates. The programme of work showed that co-ordinated testing of recruitment strategies using SWATs is feasible and can provide both definitive and timely evidence on the effectiveness of recruitment strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION Healthlines Depression (ISRCTN14172341) Healthlines CVD (ISRCTN27508731) CASPER (ISRCTN02202951) ISDR (ISRCTN87561257) ECLS (NCT01925625) REFORM (ISRCTN68240461) HeLP Diabetes (ISRCTN02123133).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Projetos de Pesquisa Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Projetos de Pesquisa Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido