Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical, Neurophysiological, and MRI Markers of Fampridine Responsiveness in Multiple Sclerosis-An Explorative Study.
Mamoei, Sepehr; Jensen, Henrik Boye; Pedersen, Andreas Kristian; Nygaard, Mikkel Karl Emil; Eskildsen, Simon Fristed; Dalgas, Ulrik; Stenager, Egon.
Afiliação
  • Mamoei S; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  • Jensen HB; Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Southern Jutland, Sønderborg, Denmark.
  • Pedersen AK; Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense, Denmark.
  • Nygaard MKE; Neurological Research Unit, MS Clinics of Southern Jutland (Sønderborg, Esbjerg, Kolding), University Hospital of Southern Jutland, Aabenraa, Denmark.
  • Eskildsen SF; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  • Dalgas U; Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense, Denmark.
  • Stenager E; Department of Brain and Nerve Diseases, University Hospital of Lillebælt, Kolding, Denmark.
Front Neurol ; 12: 758710, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34764932
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), already established as responders or non-responders to Fampridine treatment, were compared in terms of disability measures, physical and cognitive performance tests, neurophysiology, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes in a 1-year explorative longitudinal study. Materials and

Methods:

Data from a 1-year longitudinal study were analyzed. Examinations consisted of the timed 25-foot walk test (T25FW), six spot step test (SSST), nine-hole peg test (9-HPT), five times sit-to-stand test (5-STS), symbol digit modalities test (SDMT), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) elicited motor evoked potentials (MEP) examining central motor conduction times (CMCT), peripheral motor conduction times (PMCT) and their amplitudes, electroneuronography (ENG) of the lower extremities, and brain structural MRI measures.

Results:

Forty-one responders and eight non-responders to Fampridine treatment were examined. There were no intergroup differences except for the PMCT, where non-responders had prolonged conduction times compared to responders to Fampridine. Six spot step test was associated with CMCT throughout the study. After 1 year, CMCT was further prolonged and cortical MEP amplitudes decreased in both groups, while PMCT and ENG did not change. Throughout the study, CMCT was associated with the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and 12-item multiple sclerosis walking scale (MSWS-12), while SDMT was associated with number of T2-weighted lesions, lesion load, and lesion load normalized to brain volume.

Conclusions:

Peripheral motor conduction time is prolonged in non-responders to Fampridine when compared to responders. Transcranial magnetic stimulation-elicited MEPs and SDMT can be used as markers of disability progression and lesion activity visualized by MRI, respectively. Clinical Trial Registration www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03401307.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Neurol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Neurol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca