Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Inhibitory Control Training for Smoking Cessation: Outcomes, Mediators and Methodological Considerations.
Hughes, Laura K; Hayden, Melissa J; Bos, Jason; Lawrence, Natalia S; Youssef, George J; Borland, Ron; Staiger, Petra K.
Afiliação
  • Hughes LK; School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
  • Hayden MJ; Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
  • Bos J; School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
  • Lawrence NS; Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
  • Youssef GJ; Centre for Drug Use, Addictive and Anti-social Behaviour Research (CEDAAR), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
  • Borland R; School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
  • Staiger PK; Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol ; 12: 759270, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34803842
Objective: Inhibitory control training (ICT) has shown promise for improving health behaviours, however, less is known about its mediators of effectiveness. The current paper reports whether ICT reduces smoking-related outcomes such as craving and nicotine dependence, increases motivation to quit and whether reductions in smoking or craving are mediated by response inhibition or a devaluation of smoking stimuli. Method: Adult smokers (minimum 10 cigarettes per day; N = 107, M age = 46.15 years, 57 female) were randomly allocated to receive 14 days of smoking-specific ICT (named INST; a go/no-go task where participants were trained to not respond to smoking stimuli) or active control training (participants inhibited responding toward neutral stimuli). Participants were followed up to 3-months post-intervention. This trial was preregistered (Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ID: ACTRN12617000252314; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=370204). Results: There were no significant differences between ICT and active control training groups. Specifically, participants in both groups showed significant reductions in craving, nicotine dependence, motivation and a devaluation (reduced evaluation) of smoking-stimuli up to 3-months follow-up compared to baseline. Inhibition and devaluation of smoking stimuli did not act as mediators. Devaluation of smoking stimuli was an independent predictor of smoking and craving at follow-up. Conclusion: Inhibitory control training (ICT) was no more effective at reducing smoking-related outcomes compared to the active control group, however, significant improvements in craving, dependence indicators and evaluation of smoking stimuli were observed across both groups. A return to basic experimental research may be required to understand the most effective ICT approach to support smoking cessation.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Psychol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Psychol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália