Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
One and done? Repair of recurrent hernias after prior Myofascial release.
Warren, Jeremy A; Schilling, Kayla; Van Metre, Regan; Nageotte, Caroline; Cobb, William S; Carbonell, Alfredo M.
Afiliação
  • Warren JA; University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Prisma Health Upstate Department of Surgery, USA. Electronic address: Jeremy.warren@prismahealth.org.
  • Schilling K; University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, 607 Grove Rd, Greenville, SC, 29605, USA.
  • Van Metre R; University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, 607 Grove Rd, Greenville, SC, 29605, USA.
  • Nageotte C; Prisma Health Upstate, Department of Surgery Summer Program for Undergraduate Research in Surgery, USA.
  • Cobb WS; University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Prisma Health Upstate Department of Surgery, USA.
  • Carbonell AM; University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Prisma Health Upstate Department of Surgery, USA.
Am J Surg ; 224(1 Pt A): 45-50, 2022 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34972540
BACKGROUND: Myofascial release (MFR) techniques, including retromuscular hernia repair, are often considered one-time repairs. We report recurrent ventral hernia repair (RVHR) in patients with prior MFR, focusing on redo-RM repair. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing RVHR after prior MFR. Primary outcomes were operative time, surgical site infection (SSI), surgical site occurrence (SSO), and 20-month recurrence. RESULTS: 111 RVHR were performed after MFR. For patients with prior external oblique release (EOR, n = 31), transversus abdominis release (TAR) was used for repair in 13. For patients with prior TAR/PCS (posterior component separation) (n = 22), EOR (n = 2) and redo-TAR (n = 3) were employed with comparable results. Prior retromuscular (RM) repair was performed in 92 patients. Redo-RM (n = 32) and intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM; n = 38) were most common. Operative time was longer for redo-RM. SSI (12.5 vs 7.9%), SSO (40.1 vs 39.5%), and recurrence (18.8 vs 16.2%) were similar for redo-RM and IPOM repair. CONCLUSION: RVHR after prior MFR does not preclude additional MFR. Redo-RM VHR outcomes are similar to those repaired with other techniques.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hérnia Ventral Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Surg Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hérnia Ventral Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Surg Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article