Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Barriers and facilitators to taking CDK4/6 inhibitors among patients with metastatic breast cancer: a qualitative study.
Conley, Claire C; McIntyre, McKenzie; Pensak, Nicole A; Lynce, Filipa; Graham, Deena; Ismail-Khan, Roohi; Lopez, Katherine; Vadaparampil, Susan T; O'Neill, Suzanne C.
Afiliação
  • Conley CC; Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2115 Wisconsin Ave NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA. claire.conley@georgetown.edu.
  • McIntyre M; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA. claire.conley@georgetown.edu.
  • Pensak NA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Lynce F; Atlantic Coast Mind & Body, Red Bank, NJ, USA.
  • Graham D; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Ismail-Khan R; Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
  • Lopez K; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Vadaparampil ST; Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2115 Wisconsin Ave NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
  • O'Neill SC; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 192(2): 385-399, 2022 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34997364
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Most studies of adherence to treatment for breast cancer have focused on early-stage patients. Findings from these studies may not generalize to patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The objective of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators of adherence to cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors among patients with MBC, guided by the social ecologic model (SEM).

METHODS:

Patients with MBC (N = 25), their caregivers (N = 9), and oncology providers (N = 13) completed semi-structured qualitative interviews exploring their experiences with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed by three raters using a combined deductive and inductive approach.

RESULTS:

Qualitative analysis identified barriers and facilitators of adherence at each SEM level. Intrapersonal and interpersonal factors were most frequently discussed. Intrapersonal factors included knowledge/beliefs about CDK4/6 inhibitors, side effects, and establishing a routine. Interpersonal factors included effective communication with/coordination by the care team, support from family and friends, and information from other patients with MBC. Although less frequently discussed, policy factors (i.e., cost of CDK4/6 inhibitors) were of great concern to patients, caregivers, and providers.

CONCLUSION:

Barriers to adherence to CDK4/6 inhibitors exist at multiple levels. Our results underscore the potential value of a multilevel intervention (e.g., patient education, evidence-based strategies for symptom management, tips for open and assertive communication with providers, information about financial resources/support available, and so on) to support adherence in this population.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Quinase 6 Dependente de Ciclina Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Breast Cancer Res Treat Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Quinase 6 Dependente de Ciclina Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Breast Cancer Res Treat Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos