Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Durvalumab plus tremelimumab alone or in combination with low-dose or hypofractionated radiotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer refractory to previous PD(L)-1 therapy: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial.
Schoenfeld, Jonathan D; Giobbie-Hurder, Anita; Ranasinghe, Srinika; Kao, Katrina Z; Lako, Ana; Tsuji, Junko; Liu, Yang; Brennick, Ryan C; Gentzler, Ryan D; Lee, Carrie; Hubbard, Joleen; Arnold, Susanne M; Abbruzzese, James L; Jabbour, Salma K; Uboha, Nataliya V; Stephans, Kevin L; Johnson, Jennifer M; Park, Haeseong; Villaruz, Liza C; Sharon, Elad; Streicher, Howard; Ahmed, Mansoor M; Lyon, Hayley; Cibuskis, Carrie; Lennon, Niall; Jhaveri, Aashna; Yang, Lin; Altreuter, Jennifer; Gunasti, Lauren; Weirather, Jason L; Mak, Raymond H; Awad, Mark M; Rodig, Scott J; Chen, Helen X; Wu, Catherine J; Monjazeb, Arta M; Hodi, F Stephen.
Afiliação
  • Schoenfeld JD; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: Jonathan_Schoenfeld@dfci.harvard.edu.
  • Giobbie-Hurder A; Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Ranasinghe S; Center for Immuno-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Kao KZ; Center for Immuno-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Lako A; Center for Immuno-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Tsuji J; Genomics Platform, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Liu Y; Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Brennick RC; Center for Immuno-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Gentzler RD; Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  • Lee C; Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Hubbard J; Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Arnold SM; Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA.
  • Abbruzzese JL; Division of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Jabbour SK; Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
  • Uboha NV; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Stephans KL; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Johnson JM; Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center-Jefferson Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Park H; Division of Oncology, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
  • Villaruz LC; Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Sharon E; Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Streicher H; Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Ahmed MM; Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Lyon H; Genomics Platform, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Cibuskis C; Genomics Platform, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Lennon N; Genomics Platform, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Jhaveri A; Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Yang L; Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Altreuter J; Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Gunasti L; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Weirather JL; Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Mak RH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Awad MM; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Rodig SJ; Center for Immuno-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Chen HX; Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Wu CJ; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Monjazeb AM; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Hodi FS; Center for Immuno-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Lancet Oncol ; 23(2): 279-291, 2022 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35033226
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is resistant to PD-1 and PD-L1 (PD[L]-1)-targeted therapy have poor outcomes. Studies suggest that radiotherapy could enhance antitumour immunity. Therefore, we investigated the potential benefit of PD-L1 (durvalumab) and CTLA-4 (tremelimumab) inhibition alone or combined with radiotherapy.

METHODS:

This open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial was done by the National Cancer Institute Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network at 18 US sites. Patients aged 18 years or older with metastatic NSCLC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and progression during previous PD(L)-1 therapy were eligible. They were randomly assigned (111) in a web-based system by the study statistician using a permuted block scheme (block sizes of three or six) without stratification to receive either durvalumab (1500 mg intravenously every 4 weeks for a maximum of 13 cycles) plus tremelimumab (75 mg intravenously every 4 weeks for a maximum of four cycles) alone or with low-dose (0·5 Gy delivered twice per day, repeated for 2 days during each of the first four cycles of therapy) or hypofractionated radiotherapy (24 Gy total delivered over three 8-Gy fractions during the first cycle only), 1 week after initial durvalumab-tremelimumab administration. Study treatment was continued until 1 year or until progression. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (best locally assessed confirmed response of a partial or complete response) and, along with safety, was analysed in patients who received at least one dose of study therapy. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02888743, and is now complete.

FINDINGS:

Between Aug 24, 2017, and March 29, 2019, 90 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, of whom 78 (26 per group) were treated. This trial was stopped due to futility assessed in an interim analysis. At a median follow-up of 12·4 months (IQR 7·8-15·1), there were no differences in overall response rates between the durvalumab-tremelimumab alone group (three [11·5%, 90% CI 1·2-21·8] of 26 patients) and the low-dose radiotherapy group (two [7·7%, 0·0-16·3] of 26 patients; p=0·64) or the hypofractionated radiotherapy group (three [11·5%, 1·2-21·8] of 26 patients; p=0·99). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were dyspnoea (two [8%] in the durvalumab-tremelimumab alone group; three [12%] in the low-dose radiotherapy group; and three [12%] in the hypofractionated radiotherapy group) and hyponatraemia (one [4%] in the durvalumab-tremelimumab alone group vs two [8%] in the low-dose radiotherapy group vs three [12%] in the hypofractionated radiotherapy group). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in one (4%) patient in the durvalumab-tremelimumab alone group (maculopapular rash), five (19%) patients in the low-dose radiotherapy group (abdominal pain, diarrhoea, dyspnoea, hypokalemia, and respiratory failure), and four (15%) patients in the hypofractionated group (adrenal insufficiency, colitis, diarrhoea, and hyponatremia). In the low-dose radiotherapy group, there was one death from respiratory failure potentially related to study therapy.

INTERPRETATION:

Radiotherapy did not increase responses to combined PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibition in patients with NSCLC resistant to PD(L)-1 therapy. However, PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 therapy could be a treatment option for some patients. Future studies should refine predictive biomarkers in this setting.

FUNDING:

The US National Institutes of Health and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas / Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados / Hipofracionamento da Dose de Radiação / Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico / Neoplasias Pulmonares / Anticorpos Monoclonais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas / Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados / Hipofracionamento da Dose de Radiação / Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico / Neoplasias Pulmonares / Anticorpos Monoclonais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article