Stress and strain patterns of 2-implant mandibular overdentures with different positions and angulations of implants: A 3D finite element analysis study.

ABSTRACT

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The 2-implant mandibular overdenture is a popular treatment for the edentulous mandible, but information on optimum implant positions and/or angulations and their stress and strain patterns is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this finite element analysis study was to evaluate stress and strain distribution patterns in 2-implant mandibular overdentures with different positions and angulations of implants under unilateral and bilateral loading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based, 3-dimensional (3D) model of the mandible and an intraoral scanning-based 3D model of the denture were developed in the Mimics software program. A 3D model of a standard-sized implant with a low-profile overdenture attachment (LOCATOR) was developed in the Solidworks software program. Two implants were inserted in the 3D model of the mandible, with implants placed at different positions, 5, 10, 15, and 20 mm from the midline, and different distal angulations, 0-5, 0-10, 0-15, 5-5, 10-10, and 15-15 degrees (at 10-mm distance), in the 3Matics software program. Unilateral and bilateral vertical loads of 100 N were applied on the first molars in the ANSYS software program to record maximum von Mises stresses and strain values. RESULTS: The stresses in the implants were maximum when placed at a 20-mm distance (4.18 MPa under unilateral and 4.2 MPa under bilateral loading), while for the implants placed at 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm, the indicated stresses were less than 2.46 MPa following an increasing trend with an increase in the distance. The stresses in the implants were maximum when placed at 15-15-degree angulations (0.93 under unilateral and 0.92 MPa under bilateral loading). For lower angulations, the stresses on the implants ranged from 0.05 to 0.87 MPa. No specific trend was observed in stresses and strains with 0-5-, 0-10-, and 0-15-degree angulations, but an increasing trend was observed with 5-5-, 10-10-, and 15-15-degree angulations under unilateral loading. Under bilateral loading, the stresses and strains on the implants and the mandible showed negligible variations across all 6 angulations. CONCLUSIONS: The most posterior position of implants (20 mm) exhibited the highest stresses and strains on the implants and the mandible under both loading conditions. Implants placed with 15-15-degree angulations exhibited the highest stresses. Stresses and strains were similar in implants with lower angulations.