Disentangling paradigm and method can help bring qualitative research to post-positivist psychology and address the generalizability crisis.
Behav Brain Sci
; 45: e32, 2022 02 10.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-35139943
ABSTRACT
For decades, psychological research has heavily favored quantitative over qualitative methods. One reason for this imbalance is the perception that quantitative methods follow from a post-positivist paradigm, which guides mainstream psychology, whereas qualitative methods follow from a constructivist paradigm. However, methods and paradigms are independent, and embracing qualitative methods within mainstream psychology is one way of addressing the generalizability crisis.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Projetos de Pesquisa
Tipo de estudo:
Qualitative_research
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Behav Brain Sci
Ano de publicação:
2022
Tipo de documento:
Article