Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost of remote patient monitoring for cardiovascular disease: a systematic review protocol.
Zhang, Yunxi; Pena, Maria T; Fletcher, Lauren M; Swint, John M; Reneker, Jennifer C.
Afiliação
  • Zhang Y; School of Population Health, Faculty of Data Science, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
  • Pena MT; Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Fletcher LM; Academic Information Services, Faculty of Rowland Medical Library, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
  • Swint JM; School of Public Health, Faculty of Management, Policy and Community Health, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Reneker JC; School of Population Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
JBI Evid Synth ; 20(6): 1585-1592, 2022 06 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35142743
OBJECTIVE: This review aims to evaluate the costs and cost-effectiveness of remote patient monitoring for cardiovascular disease in the United States. INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular disease is a leading public health concern in the United States, resulting in a substantial economic burden. Remote patient monitoring has emerged as a viable and valuable care delivery method to improve cardiovascular disease management at home. However, there is limited systematic research of the cost and cost-effectiveness of using remote patient monitoring to manage the disease. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will consider all studies evaluating the cost of remote patient monitoring for cardiovascular disease management in the United States. The population of interest includes all individuals with various types of chronic cardiovascular disease in the United States. METHODS: The search strategy will locate both published and unpublished studies. Systematic searches will be completed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, and the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text review against the inclusion criteria. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion between all study members. The JBI checklist for economic evaluations will be utilized to evaluate the methodological quality of studies. Data will be extracted using a modified version of the JBI data extraction form for economic evaluations. Reviewers will summarize studies and cost-related metrics. The Dominance Ranking Matrix will be used to synthesize full economic evaluation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42021270621.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Cardiovasculares / Análise Custo-Benefício / Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto / Monitorização Fisiológica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: JBI Evid Synth Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Cardiovasculares / Análise Custo-Benefício / Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto / Monitorização Fisiológica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: JBI Evid Synth Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos