Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An International, Retrospective Study of Off-Label Biologic Use in the Treatment of Hypereosinophilic Syndromes.
Chen, Michael M; Roufosse, Florence; Wang, Sa A; Verstovsek, Srdan; Durrani, Sandy R; Rothenberg, Marc E; Pongdee, Thanai; Butterfield, Joseph; Lax, Timothy; Wechsler, Michael E; Stein, Miguel L; Ogbogu, Princess U; Kahwash, Basil M; Mathur, Sameer K; Simon, Dagmar; Akuthota, Praveen; Holland, Nicole; Wetzler, Lauren; Ware, JeanAnne M; Guo, Canting; Fay, Michael P; Khoury, Paneez; Klion, Amy D; Bochner, Bruce S.
Afiliação
  • Chen MM; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
  • Roufosse F; Department of Internal Medicine, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Wang SA; Department of Leukemia, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Verstovsek S; Department of Leukemia, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Durrani SR; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Rothenberg ME; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Pongdee T; Division of Allergic Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
  • Butterfield J; Division of Allergic Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
  • Lax T; Division of Allergy and Inflammation, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass.
  • Wechsler ME; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo.
  • Stein ML; Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Holon, Israel.
  • Ogbogu PU; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Otolaryngology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Kahwash BM; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Otolaryngology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Mathur SK; Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.
  • Simon D; Department of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Akuthota P; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
  • Holland N; Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
  • Wetzler L; Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
  • Ware JM; Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
  • Guo C; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
  • Fay MP; Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
  • Khoury P; Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
  • Klion AD; Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
  • Bochner BS; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill. Electronic address: bruce.bochner@northwestern.edu.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 10(5): 1217-1228.e3, 2022 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35181548
BACKGROUND: Treatment of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) often requires the use of immunomodulators with substantial side effect profiles. The emergence of biologics offers an alternative treatment modality. OBJECTIVE: To examine real-world practice data to describe the safety and consequences of various biologics suspected to directly or indirectly affect eosinophilic inflammation for the treatment of HES. METHODS: Retrospective data from 13 centers were collected via an online Research Electronic Data Capture repository. Inclusion criteria included (1) peripheral eosinophil count of 1,500/mm3 or greater without a secondary cause; (2) clinical manifestations attributable to the eosinophilia; and (3) having received mepolizumab (anti-IL-5), benralizumab (afucosylated anti-IL-5 receptor α), omalizumab (anti-IgE), alemtuzumab (anti-CD52), dupilumab (anti-IL-4 receptor α), or reslizumab (anti-IL-5) outside a placebo-controlled clinical trial. RESULTS: Of the 151 courses of biologics prescribed for 121 patients with HES, 59% resulted in improved HES symptoms and 77% enabled tapering of other HES medications. Overall, 105 patients were receiving daily systemic glucocorticoids at the time of a biologic initiation and were able to reduce the glucocorticoid dose by a median reduction of 10 mg of daily prednisone equivalents. Biologics were generally safe and well-tolerated other than infusion reactions with alemtuzumab. Thirteen of 24 patients had clinical improvement after switching biologics and nine patients responded to increasing the dose of mepolizumab after a lack of response to a lower dose. CONCLUSIONS: Biologics may offer a safer treatment alternative to existing therapies for HES, although the optimal dosing and choice for each subtype of HES remain to be determined. Limitations of this study include its retrospective nature and intersite differences in data collection and availability of each biologic.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Produtos Biológicos / Síndrome Hipereosinofílica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Produtos Biológicos / Síndrome Hipereosinofílica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article