Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen diagnostic tests for saliva samples.
Hagbom, Marie; Carmona-Vicente, Noelia; Sharma, Sumit; Olsson, Henrik; Jämtberg, Mikael; Nilsdotter-Augustinsson, Åsa; Sjöwall, Johanna; Nordgren, Johan.
Afiliação
  • Hagbom M; Division of Molecular Medicine and Virology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Carmona-Vicente N; Division of Molecular Medicine and Virology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Sharma S; Division of Molecular Medicine and Virology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Olsson H; Noviral Sweden AB, Västmannagatan 3, 111 24, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Jämtberg M; Noviral Sweden AB, Västmannagatan 3, 111 24, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Nilsdotter-Augustinsson Å; Infectious Diseases/Division of Inflammation and Infection, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Sjöwall J; Infectious Diseases/Division of Inflammation and Infection, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Nordgren J; Division of Molecular Medicine and Virology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Heliyon ; 8(2): e08998, 2022 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35233472
ABSTRACT
Using saliva samples would facilitate sample collection, diagnostic feasibility, and mass screening of SARS-CoV-2. We tested two rapid antigen (RAD) immunochromatographic tests designed for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva Rapid Response™ COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test Cassette for oral fluids and DIAGNOS™ COVID-19 Antigen Saliva Test. Evaluation of detection limit was performed with purified SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein and live SARS-CoV-2 virus. Sensitivity and specificity were further evaluated with reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) positive and negative saliva samples from hospitalized individuals with COVID-19 (n = 39) and healthcare workers (n = 20). DIAGNOS showed higher sensitivity than Rapid Response for both nucleocapsid protein and live virus. The limit of detection of the saliva test from DIAGNOS was further comparable with the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test designed for nasopharyngeal samples. DIAGNOS and Rapid Response detected nine (50.0%) and seven (38.9%), respectively, of the 18 RT-qPCR positive saliva samples. All RT-qPCR negative saliva (n = 41) were negative with both tests. Only one of the RT-qPCR positive saliva samples contained infectious virus as determined by cell culture and was also positive using the saliva RADs. The results show that the DIAGNOS may be an important and easy-to-use saliva RAD complement to detect SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals, but validation with a larger sample set is warranted.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia