Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do private providers give patients what they demand, even if it is inappropriate? A randomised study using unannounced standardised patients in Kenya.
Kwan, Ada; Boone, Claire E; Sulis, Giorgia; Gertler, Paul J.
Afiliação
  • Kwan A; Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA ada.kwan@ucsf.edu.
  • Boone CE; Division of Health Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley, California, USA.
  • Sulis G; Division of Health Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley, California, USA.
  • Gertler PJ; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
BMJ Open ; 12(3): e058746, 2022 03 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35304401
INTRODUCTION: Low and varied quality of care has been demonstrated for childhood illnesses in low-income and middle-income countries. Some quality improvement strategies focus on increasing patient engagement; however, evidence suggests that patients demanding medicines can favour the selection of resistant microbial strains in the individual and the community if drugs are inappropriately used. This study examines the effects on quality of care when patients demand different types of inappropriate medicines. METHODS: We conducted an experiment where unannounced standardised patients (SPs), locally recruited individuals trained to simulate a standardised case, present at private clinics. Between 8 March and 28 May 2019, 10 SPs portraying caretakers of a watery diarrhoea childhood case scenario (in absentia) conducted N=200 visits at 200 private, primary care clinics in Kenya. Half of the clinics were randomly assigned to receive an SP demanding amoxicillin (an antibiotic); the other half, an SP demanding albendazole (an antiparasitic drug often used for deworming), with other presenting characteristics the same. We used logistic and linear regression models to assess the effects of demanding these inappropriate medicines on correct and unnecessary case management outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with 3% among those who did not demand albendazole, the dispensing rate increased significantly to 34% for those who did (adjusted OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.22, p<0.0001). Providers did not give different levels of amoxicillin between those demanding it and those not demanding it (adjusted OR 1.73, 95% CI 0.51 to 5.82). Neither significantly changed any correct management outcomes, such as treatment or referral elsewhere. CONCLUSION: Private providers appear to account for both business-driven benefits and individual health impacts when making prescribing decisions. Additional research is needed on provider knowledge and perceptions of profit and individual and community health trade-offs when making prescription decisions after patients demand different types of inappropriate medicines. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: American Economic Association Registry (#AEARCTR-0000217) and Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (#PACTR201502000770329).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Administração de Caso / Melhoria de Qualidade Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Humans País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Administração de Caso / Melhoria de Qualidade Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Humans País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos