Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Modified Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Without Bevacizumab as a First-Line Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer-Two Centers Experiences.
Shen, Yuanming; Tang, Sangsang; Xu, Junfen; Xie, Xing; Chen, Zhongbo.
Afiliação
  • Shen Y; School of Medicine, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  • Tang S; School of Medicine, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  • Xu J; Women's Reproductive Health Laboratory of Zhejiang Province, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  • Xie X; School of Medicine, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  • Chen Z; Cancer Research Institute, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 846352, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35372416
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

To evaluate whether the modified intraperitoneal plus intravenous chemotherapy regimen as a first-line therapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in China can be well-tolerated or confer any potential benefit on survival.

Methods:

We evaluated the outcomes of women with newly diagnosed advanced-stage III-IV EOC treated with optimal cytoreductive surgery (<1 cm) and subsequent intraperitoneal plus intravenous chemotherapy or intravenous chemotherapy from January 2005 to December 2017 at two Gynecologic Oncology Centers in China. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression multivariate analysis models were performed to determine the toxicities and survival outcomes.

Results:

A total of 463 patients with stage III-IV EOC were enrolled. According to the propensity scores (12), 85 patients who received intraperitoneal plus intravenous chemotherapy (group A) were matched to 170 patients who received intravenous chemotherapy (group B). The median follow-up time was 41 months (range 6-155 months). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the median progression-free survival (PFS) (20 vs. 22 months, P = 0.351) or 3-year overall survival (OS) rate (80 vs. 78%, P = 0.749) between the two groups. R0 primary cytoreductive surgery was the only factor related to PFS (P = 0.028) and OS (P = 0.005) by Cox regression analysis. The incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events did not significantly differ between the two groups.

Conclusion:

The efficacy of intraperitoneal chemotherapy mainly comes from the intraperitoneal drug dose intensity and cumulative dose. High-efficiency and low-toxicity intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimens still need to be found and validated.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Med (Lausanne) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Med (Lausanne) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China