Early experience of the quality improvement award program in federally funded health centers.
Health Serv Res
; 57(5): 1070-1076, 2022 10.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-35396732
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES:
To describe the Health Resources and Services Administration's Quality Improvement Award (QIA) program, award patterns, and early lessons learned. STUDYSETTING:
1413 health centers were eligible for QIA from 2014 to 2018. STUDYDESIGN:
We assessed cumulative QIA funding earned and modified funding excluding payments for per-patient bonuses, electronic health record (EHR) use, patient-centered medical home (PCMH) accreditation, and health information technology. We compared health centers on rural/urban location, PCMH accreditation, EHR reporting, and size. DATA COLLECTION Organizational and quality measures are reported in the Uniform Data System, QIA program data. PRINCIPALFINDINGS:
Average cumulative funding was higher for health centers that were not rural (USD 380,387 [± USD 233,467] vs. USD 303,526 [± USD 164,272]), had PCMH accreditation (USD 401,675 [± USD 218,246] vs. USD 250,784 [± USD 144,404]), used their EHR for quality reporting (USD 374,214 (± USD 222,866) vs. USD 331,150 (± USD 198,689)), and were large (USD 435,473 (± USD 238,193) vs. USD 270,681 (± USD 114,484) an USD 231,917 (± USD 97,847) for small and medium centers, respectively). There were similar patterns, with smaller differences, for average modified payments.CONCLUSIONS:
QIA is an important feasible initiative to introduce value-based payment principles to health centers. Early lessons for program design include announcing award criteria in advance and focusing on a smaller number of priority targets.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Distinções e Prêmios
/
Informática Médica
Limite:
Humans
País/Região como assunto:
America do norte
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Health Serv Res
Ano de publicação:
2022
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Estados Unidos