Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
MRI/US fusion transperineal versus transrectral biopsy of prostate cancer: Outcomes and complication rates, a tertiary medical center experience in the Middle East.
El-Achkar, Adnan; Abou Heidar, Nassib; Labban, Muheiddine; Al-Moussawy, Mouhamad; Moukaddem, Hisham; Nasr, Rami; Khauli, Raja; El-Hajj, Albert; Bulbul, Muhammad.
Afiliação
  • El-Achkar A; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Abou Heidar N; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Labban M; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Al-Moussawy M; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Moukaddem H; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Nasr R; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Khauli R; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • El-Hajj A; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Bulbul M; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Turk J Urol ; 48(2): 98-105, 2022 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35420051
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To report on the outcomes of transperineal versus transrectal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion biopsy of the prostate including detection of clinically significant cancer and complications. This is the first and largest series in the Middle East. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Between May 2019 and June 2020, 145 patients with suspicious lesions on magnetic resonance imaging underwent magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy at our center. Transperineal biopsy was performed under light sedation, while transrectal biopsy patients had a periprostatic block for anesthesia. Clinically significant cancer was defined as Gleason ≥3+4

Results:

In all, 98 transperineal biopsies and 47 transrectal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsies were done. Patients had similar prebiopsy parameters (transperineal vs. transrectal) median age (64.5 vs. 66 years; P=.68), median prostate-specific antigen value (7.5 vs. 7.5; P=.42), and median prostate volume (51 vs. 52.5; P=.83). Those that underwent transperineal biopsy had fewer average total number of cores compared to transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (11 vs. 13; P=.025) fewer average number of random cores (3 vs. 6; P < .0001), and the detection rate of clinically significant cancer was similar between the groups (44% vs. 48.9%; P=.57). No difference in hematuria, retention, and sepsis rate requiring admission (1 vs. 2; P=.2) was observed. However, more patients had urinary tract infection in the transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy group compared to transperineal biopsy group (5 vs. 1; P=.006) that were treated with antibiotics on outside basis.

CONCLUSION:

Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound transperineal fusion biopsy has similar detection rate of clinically significant cancer compared to transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy with less urinary tract infection post biopsy.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Turk J Urol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Líbano

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Turk J Urol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Líbano