Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in oligoprogressive metastatic disease.
Ramadan, Sherif; Quan, Kimmen; Schnarr, Kara; Juergens, Rosalyn A; Hotte, Sebastien J; Mukherjee, Som D; Kapoor, Anil; Meyers, Brandon M; Swaminath, Anand.
Afiliação
  • Ramadan S; Department of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Quan K; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, LHSC, London, Canada.
  • Schnarr K; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Juergens RA; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Hotte SJ; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Mukherjee SD; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Kapoor A; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Meyers BM; Department of Surgery (Urology), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Swaminath A; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada.
Acta Oncol ; 61(6): 705-713, 2022 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35435129
PURPOSE: There is increasing interest in using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in areas of oligoprogressive metastatic disease (OPD). Our main objective was to investigate the impact of SBRT on overall survival (OS) and the incidence of systemic therapy treatment switches in this population. METHODS: A retrospective institutional review of patients treated with SBRT for OPD was performed. Patients were included if they received SBRT for 1-3 discrete progressing metastases, using a dose of at least 5 Gy per fraction. The study aimed to calculate progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and incidence of treatment switch (TS). PFS and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier methodology, while LC and TS were determined using cumulative incidence. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients with a total of 118 lesions were treated with SBRT from July 2014 to November 2020. The Median SBRT dose was 40 (18-60) Gy in 5 (2-8) fractions. Patients had primarily kidney, lung, or breast cancer. Most patients were treated with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (30.9%) or chemotherapy (29.6%) before OPD. The median follow-up post-SBRT was 14 months. Median OS and PFS were 25.1 (95% CI 11.2-39.1) months and 7.8 (95% CI 4.6-10.9) months, respectively. The cumulative incidence of local progression of treated lesions was 5% at 1 year and 7.3% at 2 years. Sixty patients progressed after SBRT and 17 underwent additional SBRT. Thirty-eight patients (47%) changed systemic therapy following SBRT; the cumulative incidence of TS was 28.5% at 6 months, 37.4% at 1 year, and 43.9% at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT effectively controls locally progressing lesions but distant progression still occurs frequently. A sizeable number of patients can be salvaged by further SBRT or have minimally progressing diseases that may not warrant an immediate initiation/switch in systemic therapy. Further prospective studies are needed to validate this benefit.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiocirurgia / Neoplasias Renais Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiocirurgia / Neoplasias Renais Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá