Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the implementation of breast diffusion-weighted imaging in clinical practice.
Lo Gullo, Roberto; Sevilimedu, Varadan; Baltzer, Pascal; Le Bihan, Denis; Camps-Herrero, Julia; Clauser, Paola; Gilbert, Fiona J; Iima, Mami; Mann, Ritse M; Partridge, Savannah C; Patterson, Andrew; Sigmund, Eric E; Thakur, Sunitha; Thibault, Fabienne E; Martincich, Laura; Pinker, Katja.
Afiliação
  • Lo Gullo R; Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
  • Sevilimedu V; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Ave, NY, New York, 10017, USA.
  • Baltzer P; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Structural Preclinical Imaging, Medical University of Vienna/Vienna General Hospital, Wien, Austria.
  • Le Bihan D; NeuroSpin/Joliot, CEA-Saclay Center, Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
  • Camps-Herrero J; Human Brain Research Center, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Clauser P; National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan.
  • Gilbert FJ; Ribera Salud Hospitals, Valencia, Spain.
  • Iima M; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Structural Preclinical Imaging, Medical University of Vienna/Vienna General Hospital, Wien, Austria.
  • Mann RM; Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
  • Partridge SC; Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Patterson A; Institute for Advancement of Clinical and Translational Science (iACT), Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Sigmund EE; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  • Thakur S; Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Thibault FE; Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Martincich L; Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
  • Pinker K; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, 6, 60 1st Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Eur Radiol ; 32(10): 6588-6597, 2022 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35507050
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To perform a survey among all European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) radiologist members to gather representative data regarding the clinical use of breast DWI.

METHODS:

An online questionnaire was developed by two board-certified radiologists, reviewed by the EUSOBI board and committees, and finally distributed among EUSOBI active and associated (not based in Europe) radiologist members. The questionnaire included 20 questions pertaining to technical preferences (acquisition time, magnet strength, breast coils, number of b values), clinical indications, imaging evaluation, and reporting. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Chi-square test of independence, and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS:

Of 1411 EUSOBI radiologist members, 275/1411 (19.5%) responded. Most (222/275, 81%) reported using DWI as part of their routine protocol. Common indications for DWI include lesion characterization (using an ADC threshold of 1.2-1.3 × 10-3 mm2/s) and prediction of response to chemotherapy. Members most commonly acquire two separate b values (114/217, 53%), with b value = 800 s/mm2 being the preferred value for appraisal among those acquiring more than two b values (71/171, 42%). Most did not use synthetic b values (169/217, 78%). While most mention hindered diffusion in the MRI report (161/213, 76%), only 142/217 (57%) report ADC values.

CONCLUSION:

The utilization of DWI in clinical practice among EUSOBI radiologists who responded to the survey is generally in line with international recommendations, with the main application being the differentiation of benign and malignant enhancing lesions, treatment response assessment, and prediction of response to chemotherapy. Report integration of qualitative and quantitative DWI data is not uniform. KEY POINTS • Clinical performance of breast DWI is in good agreement with the current recommendations of the EUSOBI International Breast DWI working group. • Breast DWI applications in clinical practice include the differentiation of benign and malignant enhancing, treatment response assessment, and prediction of response to chemotherapy. • Report integration of DWI results is not uniform.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos