Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dosimetric Results for Adjuvant Proton Radiation Therapy of HPV-Associated Oropharynx Cancer.
Wright, Christopher M; Baron, Jonathan; Lee, Daniel Y; Kim, Michele; Barsky, Andrew R; Teo, Boon-Keng Kevin; Lukens, John N; Swisher-McClure, Samuel; Lin, Alexander.
Afiliação
  • Wright CM; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Baron J; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Lee DY; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Kim M; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Barsky AR; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Teo BK; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Lukens JN; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Swisher-McClure S; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Lin A; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Int J Part Ther ; 8(4): 47-54, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35530184
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

One significant advantage of proton therapy is its ability to improve normal tissue sparing and toxicity mitigation, which is relevant in the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Here, we report our institutional experience and dosimetric results with adjuvant proton radiation therapy (PRT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-associated OPSCC. Materials and

Methods:

This was a retrospective, single institutional study of all patients treated with adjuvant PRT for HPV-associated OPSCC from 2015 to 2019. Each patient had a treatment-approved equivalent IMRT plan to serve as a reference. Endpoints included dosimetric outcomes to the organs at risk (OARs), local regional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Descriptive statistics, a 2-tailed paired t test for dosimetric comparisons, and the Kaplan-Meier method for disease outcomes were used.

Results:

Fifty-three patients were identified. Doses delivered to OARs compared favorably for PRT versus IMRT, particularly for the pharyngeal constrictors, esophagus, larynx, oral cavity, and submandibular and parotid glands. The achieved normal tissue sparing did not negatively impact disease outcomes, with 2-year LRC, PFS, and OS of 97.0%, 90.3%, and 97.5%, respectively.

Conclusion:

Our study suggests that meaningful normal tissue sparing in the postoperative setting is achievable with PRT, without impacting disease outcomes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Part Ther Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Part Ther Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos