Comparative Efficacy and Safety of P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with and without Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Increasing evidence has shown P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy is a feasible alternative treatment for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation in the modern era. However, patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a higher risk of ischemic events and more complex coronary artery disease. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this novel approach among patients with DM and those without DM. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy with 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients who underwent PCI with stent implantation. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and three other websites were searched for our data from the earliest report to January 2022. The primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE): a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and stroke. The primary safety outcome was major or minor bleeding events. The secondary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (NACE) which are defined as a composite of major bleeding and adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. A total of four randomized controlled trials with 29,136 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The quantitative analysis showed a significant reduction in major or minor bleeding events in patients treated with P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy compared to standard DAPT (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.46-0.99, p = 0.04) without increasing the risk of MACCE (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.85-1.09, p = 0.50). The number of NACE was significantly lower in the patients treated with P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-0.97, p = 0.019). In DM patients, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of MACCE compared to standard DAPT (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74-0.98, p = 0.02). Furthermore, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was accompanied by a favorable reduction in major or minor bleeding events (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.64-1.05, p = 0.107). In non-DM patients, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy showed a significant reduction in major or minor bleeding events (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.38-0.88, p = 0.01), but without increasing the risk of MACCE (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.82-1.19, p = 0.89). Based on these findings, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy could significantly decrease bleeding events without increasing the risk of stent thrombosis or myocardial infarction in the general population. The benefit of reducing bleeding events was much more significant in non-DM patients than in DM patients. Surprisingly, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy could lower the risk of MACCE in DM patients. Our study supports that P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy is a promising alternative choice of medical treatment for patients with DM undergoing PCI with stent implantation in the modern era.