Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ultrasound-guided lumbar medial branch blocks and intra-articular facet joint injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ashmore, Zachary M; Bies, Michael M; Meiling, James B; Moman, Rajat N; Hassett, Leslie C; Hunt, Christine L; Cohen, Steven P; Hooten, W Michael.
Afiliação
  • Ashmore ZM; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Bies MM; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Meiling JB; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Moman RN; Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Hassett LC; Mayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Hunt CL; Department of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Cohen SP; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Hooten WM; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Pain Rep ; 7(3): e1008, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35620250
ABSTRACT
There is great interest in expanding the use of ultrasound (US), but new challenges exist with its application to lumbar facet-targeted procedures. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the risk of incorrect needle placement associated with US-guided lumbar medial branch blocks (MBB) and facet joint injections (FJI) as confirmed by fluoroscopy or computerized tomography (CT). An a priori protocol was registered, and a database search was conducted. Inclusion criteria included all study types. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood tool for assessing risk bias for observational cohort studies. Pooled analysis of the risk difference (RD) of incorrect needle placement was calculated. Pooled analysis of 7 studies demonstrated an 11% RD (P < 0.0009) of incorrect needle placement for US-guided MBB confirmed using fluoroscopy with and without contrast. Pooled analysis of 3 studies demonstrated a 13% RD (P < 0.0001) of incorrect needle placement for US-guided FJI confirmed using CT. The time to complete a single-level MBB ranged from 2.6 to 5.0 minutes. The certainty of evidence was low to very low. Ultrasound-guided lumbar MBB and FJI are associated with a significant risk of incorrect needle placement when confirmed by fluoroscopy or CT. The technical limitations of US and individual patient factors could contribute to the risk of incorrect needle placement.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Pain Rep Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Pain Rep Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos