Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Custom Massive Allograft in a Case of Pelvic Bone Tumour: Simulation of Processing with Computerised Numerical Control vs. Robotic Machining.
Vivarelli, Leonardo; Govoni, Marco; Attala, Dario; Zoccali, Carmine; Biagini, Roberto; Dallari, Dante.
Afiliação
  • Vivarelli L; Reconstructive Orthopaedic Surgery and Innovative Techniques-Musculoskeletal Tissue Bank, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
  • Govoni M; Reconstructive Orthopaedic Surgery and Innovative Techniques-Musculoskeletal Tissue Bank, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
  • Attala D; Department of Oncological Orthopaedics-Musculoskeletal Tissue Bank, IRCCS-Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.
  • Zoccali C; Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopaedic Science, University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.
  • Biagini R; Department of Oncological Orthopaedics, IRCCS-Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.
  • Dallari D; Reconstructive Orthopaedic Surgery and Innovative Techniques-Musculoskeletal Tissue Bank, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
J Clin Med ; 11(10)2022 May 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35628908
The use of massive bone allografts after the resection of bone tumours is still a challenging process. However, to overcome some issues related to the processing procedures and guarantee the best three-dimensional matching between donor and recipient, some tissue banks have developed a virtual tissue database based on the scanning of the available allografts for using their 3D shape during virtual surgical planning (VSP) procedures. To promote the use of future VSP bone-shaping protocols useful for machining applications within a cleanroom environment, in our work, we simulate a massive bone allograft machining with two different machines: a four-axes (computer numerical control, CNC) vs. a five-axes (robot) milling machine. The allograft design was based on a real case of allograft reconstruction after pelvic tumour resection and obtained with 3D Slicer and Rhinoceros software. Machining simulations were performed with RhinoCAM and graphically and mathematically analysed with CloudCompare and R, respectively. In this case, the geometrical differences of the allograft design are not clinically relevant; however, the mathematical analysis showed that the robot performed better than the four-axes machine. The proof-of-concept presented here paves the way towards massive bone allograft cleanroom machining. Nevertheless, further studies, such as the simulation of different types of allografts and real machining on massive bone allografts, are needed.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália