Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predicting outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis using machine learning: the Aortic Stenosis Risk (ASteRisk) score.
Namasivayam, Mayooran; Myers, Paul D; Guttag, John V; Capoulade, Romain; Pibarot, Philippe; Picard, Michael H; Hung, Judy; Stultz, Collin M.
Afiliação
  • Namasivayam M; Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA mnamasivayam@mgh.harvard.edu.
  • Myers PD; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Guttag JV; Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Capoulade R; l'institut du thorax, CHU Nantes, CNRS, INSERM, University of Nantes, Nantes, France.
  • Pibarot P; Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
  • Picard MH; Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Hung J; Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Stultz CM; Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Open Heart ; 9(1)2022 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35641101
OBJECTIVE: To use echocardiographic and clinical features to develop an explainable clinical risk prediction model in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), including those with low-gradient AS (LGAS), using machine learning (ML). METHODS: In 1130 patients with moderate or severe AS, we used bootstrap lasso regression (BLR), an ML method, to identify echocardiographic and clinical features important for predicting the combined outcome of all-cause mortality or aortic valve replacement (AVR) within 5 years after the initial echocardiogram. A separate hold out set, from a different centre (n=540), was used to test the generality of the model. We also evaluated model performance with respect to each outcome separately and in different subgroups, including patients with LGAS. RESULTS: Out of 69 available variables, 26 features were identified as predictive by BLR and expert knowledge was used to further reduce this set to 9 easily available and input features without loss of efficacy. A ridge logistic regression model constructed using these features had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.74 for the combined outcome of mortality/AVR. The model reliably identified patients at high risk of death in years 2-5 (HRs ≥2.0, upper vs other quartiles, for years 2-5, p<0.05, p=not significant in year 1) and was also predictive in the cohort with LGAS (n=383, HRs≥3.3, p<0.05). The model performed similarly well in the independent hold out set (AUC 0.78, HR ≥2.5 in years 1-5, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In two separate longitudinal databases, ML identified prognostic features and produced an algorithm that predicts outcome for up to 5 years of follow-up in patients with AS, including patients with LGAS. Our algorithm, the Aortic Stenosis Risk (ASteRisk) score, is available online for public use.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Open Heart Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Open Heart Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos