Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Retrospective Evaluation of Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction in Heart Transplant Patients.
Lee, Grace Pui-Yun; Cheng, Richard K; Vasbinder, Alexi; Wu, Sixuan; Wong, Beatrice; Farris, Stephen D; Fishbein, Daniel; Wong, Jenny Man-Ching.
Afiliação
  • Lee GP; Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Cheng RK; Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Vasbinder A; School of Nursing, Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Wu S; University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Wong B; Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Farris SD; Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Fishbein D; Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Wong JM; Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Transplant Direct ; 8(6): e1329, 2022 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35651585
ABSTRACT
The dosing intensity of antithymocyte globulin as induction therapy in heart transplantation remains controversial. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rabbit antithymocyte globulin at a total dose of 4.5 mg/kg compared with <4.5 mg/kg.

Methods:

This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent heart transplantation from January 2016 to December 2018 at a single quaternary care center. Exposure was defined as full antithymocyte globulin (4.5 mg/kg total) induction compared with partial (<4.5 mg/kg) induction. The primary outcome was the incidence of The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation 1990 acute cellular rejection grade 2 or above at 2 y. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, number of infections, and time to therapeutic tacrolimus levels. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare rejection rates and mortality.

Results:

Of 201 patients, 61 received partial and 140 received full induction. There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of cellular rejection grade 2 or above (18% versus 11.4%, P = 0.209) within 2 y. The adjusted hazard ratio was 1.45 (confidence interval 0.62-3.37, P = 0.388) for partial compared with full induction for any grade rejection. Landmark survival analysis conditional on survival to 1 mo showed no difference in mortality (P = 0.239). There was no difference in the incidence of infection within 3 mo of transplant (partial 29.5% versus full 20.0%, P = 0.140). Both groups achieved therapeutic tacrolimus levels by day 7 after initiation.

Conclusions:

There was no difference in overall risk for any grade cellular rejection between partial or full dose induction therapy. Additionally, there was no difference in medium-term mortality from landmark survival analysis.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Transplant Direct Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Transplant Direct Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article