Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for benign gynaecological disease: a systematic review.
Jerbaka, Myriam; Laganà, Antonio Simone; Petousis, Stamatios; Mjaess, Georges; Ayed, Amal; Ghezzi, Fabio; Terzic, Sanjia; Sleiman, Zaki.
Afiliação
  • Jerbaka M; Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Laganà AS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
  • Petousis S; 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Ippokratio General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Mjaess G; Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Ayed A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Farwanya Hospital, MOH, Farwanya, Kuwait.
  • Ghezzi F; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
  • Terzic S; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
  • Sleiman Z; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 42(6): 1635-1641, 2022 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35695416
ABSTRACT
Benign gynaecological diseases are usually treated with minimally invasive approaches. Robotic surgery seems an alternative to laparoscopic surgery. No definitive conclusions have yet been made regarding comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for benign diseases. In this scenario, we performed a systematic review in order to assess the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopy versus robotic surgery and conclude whether laparoscopy should be replaced by robotic surgery for the treatment of benign gynaecological conditions, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) Statement. We included 64 studies no significant difference was observed regarding overall complication rate; no significant benefit of robotic approach was demonstrated regarding length of hospital stay and conversion to laparotomy; furthermore, robotic surgery is more easily used by non-experienced surgeons, while it is more expensive and characterised by longer operative time. In conclusion, current evidence indicates neither statistically significant nor clinically meaningful differences in surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries for benign gynaecological diseases. Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Benign gynaecological diseases are usually treated with minimally invasive approaches. Nevertheless, no definitive conclusions have yet been made regarding comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for benign diseases.What do the results of this study add? No significant difference was observed regarding overall complication rate; no significant benefit of robotic approach was demonstrated regarding length of hospital stay and conversion to laparotomy; furthermore, robotic surgery is more easily used by non-experienced surgeon, while it is more expensive and characterised by longer operative time.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Robotic surgery should not replace laparoscopy for the treatment of benign gynaecological conditions; in addition, gynaecologic surgeon should offer robotic surgery for benign diseases only after a proper counselling and a balanced decision-making process involving the patient.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Laparoscopia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Doenças dos Genitais Femininos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Obstet Gynaecol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Líbano

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Laparoscopia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Doenças dos Genitais Femininos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Obstet Gynaecol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Líbano