Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An automated artifact detection and rejection system for body surface gastric mapping.
Calder, Stefan; Schamberg, Gabriel; Varghese, Chris; Waite, Stephen; Sebaratnam, Gabrielle; Woodhead, Jonathan S T; Du, Peng; Andrews, Christopher N; O'Grady, Greg; Gharibans, Armen A.
Afiliação
  • Calder S; Alimetry Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Schamberg G; Alimetry Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Varghese C; Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Waite S; Alimetry Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Sebaratnam G; Alimetry Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Woodhead JST; Alimetry Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Du P; Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Andrews CN; Alimetry Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • O'Grady G; Division of Gastroenterology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Gharibans AA; Alimetry Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 34(11): e14421, 2022 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35699347
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Body surface gastric mapping (BSGM) is a new clinical tool for gastric motility diagnostics, providing high-resolution data on gastric myoelectrical activity. Artifact contamination was a key challenge to reliable test interpretation in traditional electrogastrography. This study aimed to introduce and validate an automated artifact detection and rejection system for clinical BSGM applications.

METHODS:

Ten patients with chronic gastric symptoms generated a variety of artifacts according to a standardized protocol (176 recordings) using a commercial BSGM system (Alimetry, New Zealand). An automated artifact detection and rejection algorithm was developed, and its performance was compared with a reference standard comprising consensus labeling by 3 analysis experts, followed by comparison with 6 clinicians (3 untrained and 3 trained in artifact detection). Inter-rater reliability was calculated using Fleiss' kappa. KEY

RESULTS:

Inter-rater reliability was 0.84 (95% CI0.77-0.90) among experts, 0.76 (95% CI0.68-0.83) among untrained clinicians, and 0.71 (95% CI0.62-0.79) among trained clinicians. The sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm against experts was 96% (95% CI91%-100%) and 95% (95% CI90%-99%), respectively, vs 77% (95% CI68%-85%) and 99% (95% CI96%-100%) against untrained clinicians, and 97% (95% CI92%-100%) and 88% (95% CI82%-94%) against trained clinicians. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES An automated artifact detection and rejection algorithm was developed showing >95% sensitivity and specificity vs expert markers. This algorithm overcomes an important challenge in the clinical translation of BSGM and is now being routinely implemented in patient test interpretations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Artefatos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neurogastroenterol Motil Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Zelândia

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Artefatos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neurogastroenterol Motil Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Zelândia