Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of station format on the psychometric properties of Multiple Mini Interviews.
Renaud, Jean-Sébastien; Bourget, Martine; St-Onge, Christina; Eva, Kevin W; Tavares, Walter; Salvador Loye, Alexis; Leduc, Jean-Michel; Homer, Matt.
Afiliação
  • Renaud JS; Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Office of Education and Continuing Professional Development, VITAM Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
  • Bourget M; Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
  • St-Onge C; Department of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
  • Eva KW; Centre for Health Education Scholarship, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Tavares W; Wilson Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Salvador Loye A; Research Professional, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
  • Leduc JM; Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Homer M; School of Education, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Med Educ ; 56(10): 1042-1050, 2022 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35701388
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Given the widespread use of Multiple Mini Interviews (MMIs), their impact on the selection of candidates and the considerable resources invested in preparing and administering them, it is essential to ensure their quality. Given the variety of station formats used and the degree to which that factor resides in the control of training programmes that we know so little about, format's effect on MMI quality is a considerable oversight. This study assessed the effect of two popular station formats (interview vs. role-play) on the psychometric properties of MMIs.

METHODS:

We analysed candidate data from the first 8 years of the Integrated French MMIs (IF-MMI) (2010-2017, n = 11 761 applicants), an MMI organised yearly by three francophone universities and administered at four testing sites located in two Canadian provinces. There were 84 role-play and 96 interview stations administered, totalling 180 stations. Mixed design analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were used to test the effect of station format on candidates' scores and stations' discrimination. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for interview and role-play stations were also compared. Predictive validity of both station formats was estimated with a mixed multiple linear regression model testing the relation between interview and role-play scores with average clerkship performance for those who gained entry to medical school (n = 462).

RESULTS:

Role-play stations (M = 20.67, standard deviation [SD] = 3.38) had a slightly lower mean score than interview stations (M = 21.36, SD = 3.08), p < 0.01, Cohen's d = 0.2. The correlation between role-play and interview stations scores was r = 0.5 (p < 0.01). Discrimination coefficients, Cronbach's alpha and predictive validity statistics did not vary by station format.

CONCLUSION:

Interview and role-play stations have comparable psychometric properties, suggesting format to be interchangeable. Programmes should select station format based on match to the personal qualities for which they are trying to select.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Critérios de Admissão Escolar / Faculdades de Medicina Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Med Educ Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Critérios de Admissão Escolar / Faculdades de Medicina Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Med Educ Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá