Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association between the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Zinellu, Angelo; Zinellu, Elisabetta; Pau, Maria Carmina; Carru, Ciriaco; Pirina, Pietro; Fois, Alessandro G; Mangoni, Arduino A.
Afiliação
  • Zinellu A; Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
  • Zinellu E; Clinical and Interventional Pneumology, University Hospital of Sassari (AOU), 07100 Sassari, Italy.
  • Pau MC; Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
  • Carru C; Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
  • Pirina P; Quality Control Unit, University Hospital of Sassari (AOU), 07100 Sassari, Italy.
  • Fois AG; Clinical and Interventional Pneumology, University Hospital of Sassari (AOU), 07100 Sassari, Italy.
  • Mangoni AA; Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
J Clin Med ; 11(12)2022 Jun 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35743436
ABSTRACT
The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predicts adverse outcomes in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, its prognostic role in acute exacerbations (AECOPD) is less clear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between the NLR on admission and adverse outcomes (mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, transfer to the intensive care unit, length of stay, pulmonary hypertension, or their combination) in AECOPD by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to April 2022. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, respectively. In 15 studies (n = 10,038 patients), the NLR was significantly associated with the risk of adverse outcomes (odds ratio = 1.054, 95% CI 1.016 to 1.093, p = 0.005; low certainty of evidence; standard mean difference = 0.82, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.06, p < 0.001; high certainty of evidence). Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve were 0.71 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.77), 0.73 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.80), and 0.78 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.81), respectively. In our study, the NLR on admission was significantly associated with adverse outcomes in AECOPD patients, suggesting the potential utility of this biomarker for early risk stratification and management in this group.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália