Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
CIEDE2000 lightness, chroma and hue human gingiva thresholds.
Pérez, María M; Carrillo-Perez, Francisco; Tejada-Casado, Maria; Ruiz-López, Javier; Benavides-Reyes, Cristina; Herrera, Luis Javier.
Afiliação
  • Pérez MM; Department of Optics, Faculty of Science, University of Granada, Campus Fuente Nueva, Edificio Mecenas, s/n 18071, ibsGranada, Granada, Spain. Electronic address: mmperez@ugr.es.
  • Carrillo-Perez F; Department of Computer Architecture and Computer Technology, E.T.S.I.I.T., University of Granada, s/n 18071, IBS, Granada, Spain; Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Stanford University, Medical School Office Building (MSOB), 1265 Welch Rd, Stanford, CA 94305-5479, United Sta
  • Tejada-Casado M; Department of Optics, Faculty of Science, University of Granada, Campus Fuente Nueva, Edificio Mecenas, s/n 18071, ibsGranada, Granada, Spain.
  • Ruiz-López J; Department of Optics, Faculty of Science, University of Granada, Campus Fuente Nueva, Edificio Mecenas, s/n 18071, ibsGranada, Granada, Spain.
  • Benavides-Reyes C; Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, Colegio Máximo, University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja s/n 18071, Granada, Spain.
  • Herrera LJ; Department of Computer Architecture and Computer Technology, E.T.S.I.I.T., University of Granada, s/n 18071, IBS, Granada, Spain.
J Dent ; 124: 104213, 2022 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35793761
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the visual 5050% perceptibility and acceptability CIEDE2000 lightness, chroma and hue human gingiva thresholds.

METHODS:

A psychophysical experiment based on visual assessments of simulated images of human gingiva on a calibrated display was performed. A 20-obsever panel (dentists and laypersons; n=10) evaluated three subsets of simulated human gingiva lightness subset (|ΔL'/ΔE00|≥ 0.98); chroma subset (|ΔC'/ΔE00|≥ 0.98) and hue subset (|ΔH'/ΔE00|≥ 0.96) using ΔE00< 5 units. A Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) Fuzzy Approximation model was used as fitting procedure, and 5050% perceptibility threshold (PT) and acceptability threshold (AT) were calculated. Data was statistically analyzed using t-test (p ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS:

The 5050% PT were ΔL' = 0.74 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-1.09); ΔC' = 1.10 (95% CI 0.57-1.46); ΔH' = 2.40 (95% CI 1.66->3.85). The 5050% AT were ΔL' = 2.57 (95% CI 2.00-3.06); ΔC' = 2.70 (95% CI 2.19-3.38). AT ΔH' may be considered no computable. PT values were statistically significant among the three metric differences (p ≤ 0.05). No difference was found between observers for PT values.

CONCLUSIONS:

Statistically differences in perceptual limit were found among hue, lightness and chroma for human gingiva. Thus, the observers seem to show lower sensitivity for changes in hue (ΔH') than in chroma (ΔC') and in lightness (ΔL') in the gingiva color space. CLINICAL

SIGNIFICANCE:

PT and AT for lightness, chroma and hue specific for human gingiva should be used when evaluating natural gingiva, pink gingival shade guides or pink materials, since the thresholds of perception and acceptability for teeth are not suitable.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dente / Gengiva Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Dent Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dente / Gengiva Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Dent Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article