Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility and Comparative Effectiveness for the Delivery of the National Diabetes Prevention Program through Cooperative Extension in Rural Communities.
Gorczyca, Anna M; Washburn, Richard A; Smith, Patricia; Montgomery, Robert N; Koon, Lyndsie M; Hastert, Mary; Suire, Kameron B; Donnelly, Joseph E.
Afiliação
  • Gorczyca AM; Division of Physical Activity and Weight Management, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
  • Washburn RA; Division of Physical Activity and Weight Management, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
  • Smith P; Division of Physical Activity and Weight Management, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
  • Montgomery RN; Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
  • Koon LM; Research and Training Center on Independent Living, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
  • Hastert M; Division of Physical Activity and Weight Management, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
  • Suire KB; Division of Physical Activity and Weight Management, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
  • Donnelly JE; Division of Physical Activity and Weight Management, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36011535
ABSTRACT
The U.S. Cooperative Extension Service (CE) has potential to deliver the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) to rural residents with prediabetes. However, the CE remains underutilized for the delivery of NDPP. We compared the feasibility/effectiveness of the NDPP (0-6 mos.) delivered by CE personnel to rural residents with prediabetes using Zoom® (CE-Zoom®) or by our research staff using Facebook® (FB). Adults (n = 31, age ~55 years) were enrolled (CE-Zoom® n = 16, FB n = 15). Attendance did not differ significantly between groups (CE Zoom® = 69%, FB = 83%, p = 0.15). Participant retention was similar in the CE Zoom® (88%) and FB groups (87%). CE-Zoom® and FB® groups provided weekly, self-monitoring data for 83% and 84% of the 24 potential weeks, respectively. Six-month weight loss was not different between groups (CE-Zoom® = -5.99 ± 8.0 kg, -5.4%, FB = -1.68 ± 3.3 kg, -1.6% p = 0.13). Participants achieving ≥5% weight loss was greater in the CE-Zoom® (44%) compared with the FB group (7%, p = 0.04). Participants achieving the NDPP program goal for physical activity (≥150 min/week) did not differ (CE-Zoom® = 75%, FB = 67%, p = 0.91). This pilot trial demonstrated the potential feasibility and effectiveness of the NDPP delivered by CE personnel in a group remote format (Zoom®) to adults with prediabetes living in rural areas.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estado Pré-Diabético / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estado Pré-Diabético / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos