Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety of endoscopy in patients undergoing treatments with antiangiogenic agents: A 5-year retrospective review.
Azam, Mohammad; Hudgi, Amit; Uy, Pearl Princess; Makhija, Jinal; Yap, John Erikson L.
Afiliação
  • Azam M; Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Georgia/Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, United States.
  • Hudgi A; Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Georgia/Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, United States.
  • Uy PP; Division of Gastroenterology, Medical College of Georgia/Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, United States.
  • Makhija J; Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.
  • Yap JEL; Division of Gastroenterology, Medical College of Georgia/Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, United States. jyap@augusta.edu.
World J Gastrointest Endosc ; 14(7): 416-423, 2022 Jul 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36051996
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Antiangiogenic agents (AAs) are increasingly used to treat malignant tumors and have been associated with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and perforation. Elective surgeries and endoscopy are recommended to be delayed for 31 d until after AAs treatment. Data regarding the safety of endoscopy while on antiangiogenic agents is extremely limited. No guidelines are in place to address the concern about withholding these anti-angiogenic drugs.

AIM:

To evaluate the risks of endoscopy in patients on antiangiogenic agents from 2015 to 2020 at our institution.

METHODS:

This is a single centered retrospective study approved by the institutional review board statement of the institution. Patients that underwent endoscopy within 28 d of antiangiogenic agents' treatment were included in the study. Primary outcome of interest was death, and secondary outcomes included perforation and GI bleeding. Data were analyzed utilizing descriptive statistics. Fifty-nine patients were included in the final analysis and a total of eighty-five procedures were performed that were characterized as low risk and high risk.

RESULTS:

Among the 59 patients a total of 85 endoscopic procedures were performed with 24 (28.2%) categorized as high-risk and 61 (71.8%) procedures as low-risk. Of the total number of patients, (50%) were on bevacizumab and the rest were on imatinib (11.7%), lenvatinib (6.7%) and, ramucirumab (5%). The average duration between administration of AAs and the performance of endoscopic procedures was 9.9 d. No procedure-related adverse events were noted among our study population. We did observe two deaths with one patient, on lenvatinib for metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma, who had persistent bleeding despite esophageal variceal banding and died 4 d later from hemorrhagic shock. Another patient was diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia died 24 d after an esophagogastroduodenoscopy with biopsy after transition to comfort care.

CONCLUSION:

As per this single center retrospective study, the rate of endoscopic procedure-related adverse events and death within 28 d of AA administration appears to be low.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: World J Gastrointest Endosc Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: World J Gastrointest Endosc Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos