Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Automated particle recognition for engine soot nanoparticles.
Haffner-Staton, E; Avanzini, L; La Rocca, A; Pfau, S A; Cairns, A.
Afiliação
  • Haffner-Staton E; Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottinghamshire, UK.
  • Avanzini L; Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottinghamshire, UK.
  • La Rocca A; Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottinghamshire, UK.
  • Pfau SA; Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottinghamshire, UK.
  • Cairns A; Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottinghamshire, UK.
J Microsc ; 288(1): 28-39, 2022 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36065981
ABSTRACT
A pre-trained convolution neural network based on residual error functions (ResNet) was applied to the classification of soot and non-soot carbon nanoparticles in TEM images. Two depths of ResNet, one 18 layers deep and the other 50 layers deep, were trained using training-validation sets of increasing size (containing 100, 400 and 1400 images) and were assessed using an independent test set of 200 images. Network training was optimised in terms of mini-batch size, learning rate and training length. In all tests, ResNet18 and ResNet50 had statistically similar performances, though ResNet18 required only 25-35% of the training time of ResNet50. Training using the 100-, 400- and 1400-image training-validation sets led to classification accuracies of 84%, 88% and 95%, respectively. ResNet18 and ResNet50 were also compared for their ability to categorise soot and non-soot nanoparticles via a fivefold cross-validation experiment using the entire set of 800 images of soot and 800 images of non-soot. Cross-validation was repeated 3 times with different training durations. For all cross-validation experiments, classification accuracy exceeded 91%, with no statistical differences between any of the network trainings. The most efficient network was ResNet18 trained for 5 epochs, which reached 91.2% classification after only 84 s of training on 1600 images. Use of ResNet for classification of 1000 images, the amount suggested for reliable characterisation of soot sample, requires <4 s, compared with >30 min for a skilled operator classifying images manually. Use of convolution neural networks for classification of soot and non-soot nanoparticles in TEM images is highly promising, particularly when manually classified data sets have already been established.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fuligem / Nanopartículas Idioma: En Revista: J Microsc Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fuligem / Nanopartículas Idioma: En Revista: J Microsc Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido