Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Relevant optical properties for gingiva-colored resin-based composites.
Lucena, Cristina; Benavides-Reyes, Cristina; Ruiz-López, Javier; Tejada-Casado, Maria; Pulgar, Rosa; Pérez, María M.
Afiliação
  • Lucena C; Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, Colegio Máximo, Campus de Cartuja s/n. University of Granada. 18071. Granada. Spain.
  • Benavides-Reyes C; Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, Colegio Máximo, Campus de Cartuja s/n. University of Granada. 18071. Granada. Spain.
  • Ruiz-López J; Department of Optics, Faculty of Science, Campus Fuentenueva, Edificio Mecenas, s/n. University of Granada. 18071. Granada, Spain.
  • Tejada-Casado M; Department of Optics, Faculty of Science, Campus Fuentenueva, Edificio Mecenas, s/n. University of Granada. 18071. Granada, Spain.
  • Pulgar R; Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, Colegio Máximo, Campus de Cartuja s/n. University of Granada. 18071. Granada. Spain.
  • Pérez MM; Department of Optics, Faculty of Science, Campus Fuentenueva, Edificio Mecenas, s/n. University of Granada. 18071. Granada, Spain. Electronic address: mmperez@ugr.es.
J Dent ; 126: 104316, 2022 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36195249
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the optical properties of gingiva-colored resin-based composites (GCRBCs). METHODS: Five discs (8 mm diameter x 1mm height) of 17 shades of GCRBCs were prepared. Diffuse reflectance was measured against white and black backgrounds using a calibrated spectroradiometer, CIE D65 illuminant and the CIE 45°/0° geometry. Relative translucency parameter was calculated using ΔE00 (RTP00). Translucency differences were evaluated using published data of 50:50% translucency perceptibility (TPT00) and acceptability (TAT00) thresholds. Scattering (S) and absorption (K) coefficients and transmittance (T%) were calculated using Kubelka-Munk's equations. Data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney tests, and VAF coefficient. RESULTS: The RTP00 values of the 17 evaluated shades ranged from 8.69 to 21.34. There were perceptible translucency differences (TPT00=0.62) between different shades of the same brand and between composites designated with the same shade of different brands. Spectral distributions of S, K and T were wavelength-dependent. Although the spectral behavior of the S and K coefficients and T% were similar for all the gingival composites evaluated, the values of these parameters presented statistically significant differences between shades, which would justify the differences found in the relative translucency parameter. CONCLUSIONS: The optical properties S, K and T% of GCRBCs were significantly different, resulting in perceptible translucency differences between the same shade of different commercial brands and between different shades of the same brand. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Translucency differences of gingiva-colored composites may significantly influence their masking ability affecting the clinician's choice of restorative material.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Resinas Compostas / Gengiva Idioma: En Revista: J Dent Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Resinas Compostas / Gengiva Idioma: En Revista: J Dent Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article