Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adjuvant Capecitabine Following Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Miao, Jingjing; Wang, Lin; Tan, Sze Huey; Li, Jin-Gao; Yi, Junlin; Ong, Enya H W; Tan, Laura L Y; Zhang, Ye; Gong, Xiaochang; Chen, Qiuyan; Xiang, Yan-Qun; Chen, Ming-Yuan; Guo, Ying; Lv, Xing; Xia, Wei-Xiong; Tang, Linquan; Deng, Xiaowu; Guo, Xiang; Han, Fei; Mai, Hai-Qiang; Chua, Melvin L K; Zhao, Chong.
Afiliação
  • Miao J; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
  • Wang L; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
  • Tan SH; Division of Clinical Trials & Epidemiological Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
  • Li JG; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
  • Yi J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
  • Ong EHW; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
  • Tan LLY; Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, PR China.
  • Zhang Y; Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
  • Gong X; Department of Head and Neck and Thoracic Cancers, Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
  • Chen Q; Ministry of Health Holdings, Singapore.
  • Xiang YQ; Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, PR China.
  • Chen MY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
  • Guo Y; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
  • Lv X; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
  • Xia WX; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
  • Tang L; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
  • Deng X; Department of Clinical Trials Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
  • Guo X; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
  • Han F; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
  • Mai HQ; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
  • Chua MLK; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
  • Zhao C; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
JAMA Oncol ; 2022 Oct 13.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36227615
ABSTRACT
Importance Induction or adjuvant chemotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) are first-line treatment options for treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). Adjuvant platinum regimens are, however, poorly tolerated, highlighting the unmet need for an efficacious, tolerable adjuvant regimen.

Objective:

To investigate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant capecitabine with CCRT for the treatment of patients with LA-NPC. Design, Setting, and

Participants:

This open-label randomized clinical trial recruited patients from March 31, 2014, to July 27, 2018, at 3 institutions in China, with at least 3 years of follow-up. The data collection cutoff date was February 9, 2022. Eligibility included stage III-IVb nasopharyngeal carcinoma and at least 1 of the following T3-4N2 or T1-4N3; plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA titer higher than 20 000 copies/mL; primary gross tumor volume larger than 30.0 cm3; fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography/computed tomography maximum standard uptake value of the primary gross tumor volume larger than 10.0; or multiple nodal metastases and any larger than 4.0 cm.

Interventions:

Patients were randomly assigned 11 to receive either capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks for 8 cycles) or observation following CCRT (100 mg/m2 cisplatin every 3 weeks for 2 to 3 cycles, depending on duration of radiotherapy). Main Outcomes and

Measures:

Failure-free survival in the intention-to-treat cohort was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves compared with the log-rank test. Unstratified Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios, with corresponding 95% CIs based on the Wald test.

Results:

There were 180 patients enrolled (median [IQR] age, 47 [40-55] years; 143 [79.4%] men). Among 90 patients in the capecitabine group, 76 (84.4%) had at least 2 high-risk factors; among 90 patients in the control group, 80 (88.9%) had at least 2 high-risk factors. All patients completed CCRT, except 1 patient in the capecitabine group who received 1 cycle of cisplatin. Of the 90 patients in the capecitabine group, 85 (94.4%) received capecitabine, with 71 (78.9%) completing 8 cycles. With a median (IQR) follow-up of 58.0 (49.5-80.1) months, 18 events were recorded in the capecitabine group vs 31 events in the control group. Failure-free survival was improved with adjuvant capecitabine (3 years, 83.3% vs 72.2%; 5 years, 78.5% vs 65.9%; hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.30-0.94]; P = .03). The incidence of grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was higher in the capecitabine group than in the control group (54 of 90 patients [60.0%] vs 46 of 90 patients [51.1%]). Treatment-related adverse events included xerostomia (17 [18.9%] vs 9 [10.0%] patients), mucositis (21 [23.3%] vs 15 [16.7%] patients), and anorexia (8 [8.9%] vs 4 [4.4%] patients). The incidence of grade 3 delayed treatment-related adverse events was comparable in both groups (9 of 83 [10.8%] vs 7 of 81 [8.6%] patients). Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, adjuvant capecitabine at the full dose following CCRT was well tolerated and improved failure-free survival among patients with LA-NPC and high-risk factors. Further investigations assessing optimal dose and duration are warranted. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02143388.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Oncol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Oncol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article