Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression in Lung Cancer and Paired Brain Metastases-a Single-Center Study in 190 Patients.
JTO Clin Res Rep
; 3(11): 100413, 2022 Nov.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-36275910
Introduction: Expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is the only routinely used tissue biomarker for predicting response to programmed cell death protein 1/PD-L1 inhibitors. It is to date unclear whether PD-L1 expression is preserved in brain metastases (BMs). Methods: In this single-center, retrospective study, we evaluated PD-L1 expression using the SP263 assay in consecutively resected BMs of lung carcinomas and paired primary tumors, diagnosed from 2000 to 2015, with correlation to clinicopathological and molecular tumor and patient characteristics. Results: PD-L1 tumor proportional score (TPS) could be evaluated on whole tissue slides in 191 BMs and 84 paired primary lung carcinomas. PD-L1 TPS was less than 1% in 113 of 191 (59.2%), 1% to 49% in 34 of 191 (17.8%), and greater than or equal to 50% in 44 of 191 (23.0%) BMs. TPS was concordant between BMs and paired primary lung carcinomas in most cases, with discordance regarding the clinically relevant cutoffs at 1% and 50% in 18 of 84 patients (21.4%). Four of 18 discordant cases had no shared mutations between the primary lung carcinoma and BM. Intratumoral heterogeneity, as assessed using tissue microarray cores, was only significant at the primary site (p Wilcoxon signed rank = 0.002) with higher PD-L1 TPS at the infiltration front (mean = 40.4%, interquartile range: 0%-90%). Neither TPS greater than or equal to 1% nor TPS greater than or equal to 50% nor discordance between the primary lung carcinoma and BMs had prognostic significance regarding overall survival or BM-specific overall survival. Conclusions: PD-L1 expression was mostly concordant between primary lung carcinoma and its BM and between resections of BM and stereotactic biopsies, mirrored by tissue microarray cores. Differences in PD-L1 TPS existed primarily in cases with TPS greater than 10%, for which also human assessment tends to be most error prone.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Tipo de estudo:
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Idioma:
En
Revista:
JTO Clin Res Rep
Ano de publicação:
2022
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Suíça