Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development of quality assurance program for digital pathology by the Korean Society of Pathologists.
Chong, Yosep; Bae, Jeong Mo; Kang, Dong Wook; Kim, Gwangil; Han, Hye Seung.
Afiliação
  • Chong Y; Department of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • Bae JM; Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kang DW; Department of Pathology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
  • Kim G; Department of Pathology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea.
  • Han HS; Department of Pathology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Pathol Transl Med ; 56(6): 370-382, 2022 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36413980
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Digital pathology (DP) using whole slide imaging is a recently emerging game changer technology that can fundamentally change the way of working in pathology. The Digital Pathology Study Group (DPSG) of the Korean Society of Pathologists (KSP) published a consensus report on the recommendations for pathologic practice using DP. Accordingly, the need for the development and implementation of a quality assurance program (QAP) for DP has been raised.

METHODS:

To provide a standard baseline reference for internal and external QAP for DP, the members of the Committee of Quality Assurance of the KSP developed a checklist for the Redbook and a QAP trial for DP based on the prior DPSG consensus report. Four leading institutes participated in the QAP trial in the first year, and we gathered feedback from these institutes afterwards.

RESULTS:

The newly developed checklists of QAP for DP contain 39 items (216 score) eight items for quality control of DP systems; three for DP personnel; nine for hardware and software requirements for DP systems; 15 for validation, operation, and management of DP systems; and four for data security and personal information protection. Most participants in the QAP trial replied that continuous education on unfamiliar terminology and more practical experience is demanding.

CONCLUSIONS:

The QAP for DP is essential for the safe implementation of DP in pathologic practice. Each laboratory should prepare an institutional QAP according to this checklist, and consecutive revision of the checklist with feedback from the QAP trial for DP needs to follow.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Pathol Transl Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Pathol Transl Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article