Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Urban Onsite Sanitation Upgrades and Synanthropic Flies in Maputo, Mozambique: Effects on Enteric Pathogen Infection Risks.
Capone, Drew; Adriano, Zaida; Cumming, Oliver; Irish, Seth R; Knee, Jackie; Nala, Rassul; Brown, Joe.
Afiliação
  • Capone D; Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Indiana University, 2719 E 10th St, Bloomington, Indiana47401, United States.
  • Adriano Z; WE Consult ltd, 177 Rua Tomas Ribeiro, Maputo1102, Mozambique.
  • Cumming O; Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, LondonWC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
  • Irish SR; Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzstrasse 2, Allschwil4123, Switzerland.
  • Knee J; Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, LondonWC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
  • Nala R; Ministério da Saúde, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Maputo, Maputo1102, Mozambique.
  • Brown J; Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina27599, United States.
Environ Sci Technol ; 57(1): 549-560, 2023 01 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36516327
ABSTRACT
Synanthropic filth flies transport enteric pathogens from feces to food, which upon consumption poses an infection risk. We evaluated the effect of an onsite sanitation intervention─including fly control measures─in Maputo, Mozambique, on the risk of infection from consuming fly-contaminated food. After enumerating flies at intervention and control sites, we cultured fecal indicator bacteria, quantified gene copies for 22 enteric pathogens via reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and developed quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) models to estimate annual risks of infection attributable to fly-contaminated foods. We found that the intervention reduced fly counts at latrine entrances by 69% (aRR = 0.31, [0.13, 0.75]) but not at food preparation areas (aRR = 0.92, [0.33, 2.6]). Half of (23/46) of individual flies were positive for culturable Escherichia coli, and we detected ≥1 pathogen gene from 45% (79/176) of flies, including enteropathogenic E. coli (37/176), adenovirus (25/176), Giardia spp. (13/176), and Trichuris trichiura (12/176). We detected ≥1 pathogen gene from half the flies caught in control (54%, 30/56) and intervention compounds (50%, 17/34) at baseline, which decreased 12 months post-intervention to 43% (23/53) at control compounds and 27% (9/33) for intervention compounds. These data indicate flies as a potentially important mechanical vector for enteric pathogen transmission in this setting. The intervention may have reduced the risk of fly-mediated enteric infection for some pathogens, but infrequent detection resulted in wide confidence intervals; we observed no apparent difference in infection risk between groups in a pooled estimate of all pathogens assessed (aRR = 0.84, [0.61, 1.2]). The infection risks posed by flies suggest that the design of sanitation systems and service delivery should include fly control measures to prevent enteric pathogen transmission.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saneamento / Dípteros Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: Environ Sci Technol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saneamento / Dípteros Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: Environ Sci Technol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos