Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can Wearable Inertial Measurement Units Be Used to Measure Sleep Biomechanics? Establishing Initial Feasibility and Validity.
Buckley, Nicholas; Davey, Paul; Jensen, Lynn; Baptist, Kevin; Jansen, Bas; Campbell, Amity; Downs, Jenny.
Afiliação
  • Buckley N; Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.
  • Davey P; Telethon Kids Institute, Child Disability Team, Perth 6009, Australia.
  • Jensen L; Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.
  • Baptist K; Perth Children's Hospital, Perth 6009, Australia.
  • Jansen B; Ace Therapy Services, Perth 6021, Australia.
  • Campbell A; Postural Care Australia, Perth 6024, Australia.
  • Downs J; Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.
Biomimetics (Basel) ; 8(1)2022 Dec 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36648788
ABSTRACT
Wearable motion sensors, specifically, Inertial Measurement Units, are useful tools for the assessment of orientation and movement during sleep. The DOTs platform (Xsens, Enschede, The Netherlands) has shown promise for this purpose. This pilot study aimed to assess its feasibility and validity for recording sleep biomechanics. Feasibility was assessed using four metrics Drift, Battery Life, Reliability of Recording, and Participant Comfort. Each metric was rated as Stop (least successful), Continue But Modify Protocol, Continue But Monitor Closely, or Continue Without Modifications (most successful). A convenience sample of ten adults slept for one night with a DOT unit attached to their sternum, abdomen, and left and right legs. A survey was administered the following day to assess participant comfort wearing the DOTs. A subset of five participants underwent a single evaluation in a Vicon (Oxford Metrics, Oxford, UK) motion analysis lab to assess XSENS DOTs' validity. With the two systems recording simultaneously, participants were prompted through a series of movements intended to mimic typical sleep biomechanics (rolling over in lying), and the outputs of both systems were compared to assess the level of agreement. The DOT platform performed well on all metrics, with Drift, Battery Life, and Recording Reliability being rated as Continue Without Modifications. Participant Comfort was rated as Continue But Monitor Closely. The DOT Platform demonstrated an extremely high level of agreement with the Vicon motion analysis lab (difference of <0.025°). Using the Xsens DOT platform to assess sleep biomechanics is feasible and valid in adult populations. Future studies should further investigate the feasibility of using this data capture method for extended periods (e.g., multiple days) and in other groups (e.g., paediatric populations).
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Biomimetics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Biomimetics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália