Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Provision of information by midwives for pregnant women in England on guidance on foods/drinks to avoid or limit.
Beasant, Lucy; Ingram, Jenny; Tonks, Rachel; Taylor, Caroline M.
Afiliação
  • Beasant L; Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
  • Ingram J; Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
  • Tonks R; School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
  • Taylor CM; Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. Caroline.m.taylor@bristol.ac.uk.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 23(1): 152, 2023 Mar 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36890490
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The National Health Service (NHS) website gives guidance for pregnant women in England on foods/drinks to avoid or limit because of microbiological, toxicological or teratogenic hazards. These include, for example, some types of soft cheeses, fish/seafood and meat products. This website and midwives are trusted sources of information for pregnant women, but the ways in which midwives can be supported to provide clear and accurate information are unknown.

AIMS:

The aims were to (1) determine midwives' accuracy of recall of information and confidence in delivering the guidance to women; (2) identify barriers to provision; (3) identify the ways in which midwives provide this information to women.

METHODS:

Registered Midwives practicing in England completed an online questionnaire. Questions included those on what information they provided and their confidence in delivering it, the ways they provided information on foods to avoid/limit, their recall of some of the guidance, and what resources they used. Ethics approval was given by the University of Bristol.

RESULTS:

More than 10% of midwives (n = 122) were 'Not at all confident/Don't know' in providing advice about ten items, including game meat/gamebirds (42% and 43%, respectively), herbal teas (14%) and cured meats (12%). Only 32% correctly recalled overall advice on eating fish, and only 38% the advice on tinned tuna. The main barriers to provision were lack of time in appointments and lack of training. The most usual methods of disseminating information were verbal (79%) and signposting to websites (55%).

CONCLUSION:

Midwives were often unconfident about their ability to provide accurate guidance, and recall on items tested was frequently mistaken. Delivery of guidance by midwives on foods to avoid or limit needs to be supported by appropriate training and access to resources, and sufficient time in appointments. Further research on barriers to the delivery and implementation of the NHS guidance is needed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gestantes / Tocologia Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Assunto da revista: OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gestantes / Tocologia Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Assunto da revista: OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido