Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Advancing Use of DEXA Scans to Quantitatively and Qualitatively Evaluate Lateral Spinal Curves, for Preliminary Identification of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
Ng, P T T; Straker, L; Tucker, K; Izatt, M T; Claus, A.
Afiliação
  • Ng PTT; Laboratory for Motor Control and Pain Research, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. phoebe.ng@uqconnect.edu.au.
  • Straker L; Physiotherapy Department, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. phoebe.ng@uqconnect.edu.au.
  • Tucker K; School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, WA, Australia.
  • Izatt MT; Laboratory for Motor Control and Pain Research, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Claus A; Biomechanics and Spine Research Group, Queensland University of Technology at the Centre for Children's Health Research, South Brisbane, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Calcif Tissue Int ; 112(6): 656-665, 2023 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36907926
ABSTRACT
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan is an emerging screening method for identifying likely adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Using DEXA in an unbiased population sample (the Raine Study), we aimed to report the inter-rater reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC95) for scoliosis curve angle measurement, identify likely AIS prevalence, and the concordance between reported AIS diagnosis and DEXA-identified likely AIS. Scoliosis curve angles were measured using the modified Ferguson method on DEXA scans (n = 1238) at age 20 years. For curve angle inter-rater reliability, two examiners measured angles (6-40°) on 41 scans. Likely, AIS was determined with quantitative and qualitative criteria (modified Ferguson angles ≥ 10° and expert review of spinal curves).The inter-rater reliability for scoliosis curve angle measurement was good-excellent (ICC 0.82; 95% CI 0.71-0.89; p < 0.001), and MDC95 was 6.2°. The prevalence of likely AIS was 2.1% (26/1238). Diagnosis of AIS was reported despite little or no scoliosis curve (< 3.8°) for 20 participants (1.6%), and diagnosis of AIS was not reported despite scoliosis curve ≥ 10° for 11 participants (0.9%). Results support the use of modified Ferguson method to measure scoliosis curve angles on DEXA. There is potential utility for using a combination of quantitative measurement and qualitative criteria to evaluate DEXA images, to identify likely AIS for reporting prevalence. Without formal school screening, the analysis of DEXA in this population sample suggested that relying on current health professional diagnosis alone could result in 2.5% of this cohort being at risk of false positive diagnosis or delay in necessary management due to non-diagnosis of AIS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Escoliose / Coluna Vertebral Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Calcif Tissue Int Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Escoliose / Coluna Vertebral Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Calcif Tissue Int Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália