Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Dreger, Nici Markus; Stapelmann, Dominik; Rebacz, Patrick; Roth, Stephan; Brandt, Alexander Sascha; von Rundstedt, Friedrich-Carl; Degener, Stephan.
Afiliação
  • Dreger NM; Department of Urology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstrasse 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany.
  • Stapelmann D; Department of Urology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstrasse 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany.
  • Rebacz P; Department of Radiology, St. Franziskus-Hospital Münster, 48145, Münster, Germany.
  • Roth S; Didactics and Educational Research in Healthcare, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58455, Witten, Germany.
  • Brandt AS; Department of Urology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstrasse 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany.
  • von Rundstedt FC; Department of Urology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstrasse 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany.
  • Degener S; Urologisches Zentrum Euregio, Humboldtstrasse 1, 52152, Simmerath, Germany.
BMC Urol ; 23(1): 46, 2023 Mar 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36978025
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We evaluated the hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis (RPP) as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram to assess ureteral patency after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

METHODS:

Retrospective non-inferiority study analyzing 248 PCNL-patients (86 female (35%) and 162 males (65%)) between 2007 and 2015. Postoperatively, RPP was measured using a central venous pressure manometer in cmH2O. The primary endpoint was to assess RPP depending on the patency of the ureter and the nephrostomy tube removal. Secondary, the upper limit of normal RPP of [Formula see text] 20 cmH2O was assessed as an indicator of an unobstructed patency.

RESULTS:

The median procedure duration was 141 min (112-171.5) with a stone free rate of 82% (n = 202). RPP was significantly higher in patients with obstructive nephrostogram with 25.0 mmH2O (21.0-32.0) versus 20.0 mmH2O (16.0-24.0; p < 0.001). The pressure was lower in successful nephrostomy removal with 18 cmH2O (15-21) versus 23 cmH2O (20-29) in the leakage group (p < 0.001). The analysis of a cut-off of [Formula see text] 20 cmH2O showed a sensitivity of 76.9% (95% CI [60.7%; 88.9%]) and a specificity of 61.5% (95% CI [54.6%; 68.2%]). The negative predictive value was 93.4% (95% CI [87.9%; 97.0%]) and the positive predictive value 27.3% (95% CI [19.2%; 36.6%]). The accuracy of the model showed an AUC = 0.795 (95% CI [0.668; 0.862]).

CONCLUSION:

The hydrostatic RPP seems to allow a bedside evaluation of ureteral patency after PCNL.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Nefrostomia Percutânea / Cálculos Renais / Nefrolitotomia Percutânea Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: BMC Urol Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Nefrostomia Percutânea / Cálculos Renais / Nefrolitotomia Percutânea Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: BMC Urol Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha