Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Functional connectomics reveals general wiring rule in mouse visual cortex.
Ding, Zhuokun; Fahey, Paul G; Papadopoulos, Stelios; Wang, Eric Y; Celii, Brendan; Papadopoulos, Christos; Kunin, Alexander B; Chang, Andersen; Fu, Jiakun; Ding, Zhiwei; Patel, Saumil; Ponder, Kayla; Muhammad, Taliah; Bae, J Alexander; Bodor, Agnes L; Brittain, Derrick; Buchanan, JoAnn; Bumbarger, Daniel J; Castro, Manuel A; Cobos, Erick; Dorkenwald, Sven; Elabbady, Leila; Halageri, Akhilesh; Jia, Zhen; Jordan, Chris; Kapner, Dan; Kemnitz, Nico; Kinn, Sam; Lee, Kisuk; Li, Kai; Lu, Ran; Macrina, Thomas; Mahalingam, Gayathri; Mitchell, Eric; Mondal, Shanka Subhra; Mu, Shang; Nehoran, Barak; Popovych, Sergiy; Schneider-Mizell, Casey M; Silversmith, William; Takeno, Marc; Torres, Russel; Turner, Nicholas L; Wong, William; Wu, Jingpeng; Yin, Wenjing; Yu, Szi-Chieh; Froudarakis, Emmanouil; Sinz, Fabian; Seung, H Sebastian.
Afiliação
  • Ding Z; Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Fahey PG; Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Papadopoulos S; Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Wang EY; Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Celii B; Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Papadopoulos C; Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Kunin AB; Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Chang A; Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Fu J; Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Ding Z; Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Patel S; Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Ponder K; Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Muhammad T; Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Bae JA; Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Bodor AL; Department of Mathematics, Creighton University, Omaha, USA.
  • Brittain D; Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Buchanan J; Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Bumbarger DJ; Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Castro MA; Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Cobos E; Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Dorkenwald S; Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Elabbady L; Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Halageri A; Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Jia Z; Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Jordan C; Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Kapner D; Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Kemnitz N; Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Kinn S; Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA.
  • Lee K; Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA.
  • Li K; Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, USA.
  • Lu R; Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, USA.
  • Macrina T; Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, USA.
  • Mahalingam G; Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, USA.
  • Mitchell E; Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA.
  • Mondal SS; Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Mu S; Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
  • Nehoran B; Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA.
  • Popovych S; Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA.
  • Schneider-Mizell CM; Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, USA.
  • Silversmith W; Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA.
  • Takeno M; Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA.
  • Torres R; Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA.
  • Turner NL; Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA.
  • Wong W; Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, USA.
  • Wu J; Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA.
  • Yin W; Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, USA.
  • Yu SC; Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA.
  • Froudarakis E; Brain & Cognitive Sciences Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.
  • Sinz F; Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA.
  • Seung HS; Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA.
bioRxiv ; 2023 Mar 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36993398
To understand how the brain computes, it is important to unravel the relationship between circuit connectivity and function. Previous research has shown that excitatory neurons in layer 2/3 of the primary visual cortex of mice with similar response properties are more likely to form connections. However, technical challenges of combining synaptic connectivity and functional measurements have limited these studies to few, highly local connections. Utilizing the millimeter scale and nanometer resolution of the MICrONS dataset, we studied the connectivity-function relationship in excitatory neurons of the mouse visual cortex across interlaminar and interarea projections, assessing connection selectivity at the coarse axon trajectory and fine synaptic formation levels. A digital twin model of this mouse, that accurately predicted responses to arbitrary video stimuli, enabled a comprehensive characterization of the function of neurons. We found that neurons with highly correlated responses to natural videos tended to be connected with each other, not only within the same cortical area but also across multiple layers and visual areas, including feedforward and feedback connections, whereas we did not find that orientation preference predicted connectivity. The digital twin model separated each neuron's tuning into a feature component (what the neuron responds to) and a spatial component (where the neuron's receptive field is located). We show that the feature, but not the spatial component, predicted which neurons were connected at the fine synaptic scale. Together, our results demonstrate the "like-to-like" connectivity rule generalizes to multiple connection types, and the rich MICrONS dataset is suitable to further refine a mechanistic understanding of circuit structure and function.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: BioRxiv Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: BioRxiv Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos