Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Comparative Evaluation of Iliac Crest Cortical-Cancellous Bone Blocks Graft With and Without Concentrated Growth Factors (CGFs) in Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting: A Retrospective Study.
Lai, Yongzhen; Jiang, Xiao Xian; Lu, Meng; Mao, Chuanqing; Cai, Zhiyu; Wang, Chengyong; Liu, Jing; Chen, Weihui.
Afiliação
  • Lai Y; Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Science, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital.
  • Jiang XX; Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Science, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital.
  • Lu M; Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Science, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital.
  • Mao C; Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Science, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital.
  • Cai Z; Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Science, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital.
  • Wang C; Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Science, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital.
  • Liu J; Department of Stomatology, Fujian Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.
  • Chen W; Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Science, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital.
J Craniofac Surg ; 34(6): 1789-1794, 2023 Sep 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37010314
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical effect and bone resorption of iliac crest cortical-cancellous bone block grafts combined with concentrated growth factor (CGF) compared with iliac crest cortical-cancellous bone block grafts only in secondary alveolar bone grafting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients (43 in the CGF group and 43 in the non-CGF group) with unilateral alveolar clefts were examined. Patients (17 in the CGF group and 17 in the non-CGF group) were randomly chosen for radiologic evaluation. Quantitative evaluation of the bone resorption rate was made with cone-beam computed tomography and Mimics 19.0 software at 1 week and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: The success rate of bone grafting was 95.3% and 79.1% in the CGF and non-CGF groups, respectively ( P =0.025). The mean bone resorption rate at 12 months postoperatively was 35.66±15.80% and 41.39±19.57% in the CGF and non-CGF groups, respectively ( P =0.355). The bone resorption patterns of the 2 groups were similar on the labial, alveolar process, and palatal sides, and there was no obvious bone resorption on the labial side in either group. Nasal side bone resorption in the CGF group was significantly less than that in the non-CGF group ( P =0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Cortical-cancellous bone block grafts reduce labial bone resorption, while CGF reduces nasal bone resorption and improves the success rate. The combination of bone block and CGF in secondary alveolar bone grafting is worthy of further clinical application.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reabsorção Óssea / Fissura Palatina / Enxerto de Osso Alveolar Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Craniofac Surg Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reabsorção Óssea / Fissura Palatina / Enxerto de Osso Alveolar Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Craniofac Surg Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article