Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fair domestic allocation of monkeypox virus countermeasures.
Persad, Govind; Leland, R J; Ottersen, Trygve; Richardson, Henry S; Saenz, Carla; Schaefer, G Owen; Emanuel, Ezekiel J.
Afiliação
  • Persad G; Sturm College of Law, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
  • Leland RJ; Department of Philosophy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
  • Ottersen T; Division of Infection Control, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Richardson HS; Department of Philosophy and Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Saenz C; Department of Evidence and Intelligence for Action in Health, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Schaefer GO; Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Emanuel EJ; Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: zemanuel@upenn.edu.
Lancet Public Health ; 8(5): e378-e382, 2023 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37120261
ABSTRACT
Countermeasures for mpox (formerly known as monkeypox), primarily vaccines, have been in limited supply in many countries during outbreaks. Equitable allocation of scarce resources during public health emergencies is a complex challenge. Identifying the objectives and core values for the allocation of mpox countermeasures, using those values to provide guidance for priority groups and prioritisation tiers, and optimising allocation implementation are important. The fundamental values for the allocation of mpox countermeasures are preventing death and illness; reducing the association between death or illness and unjust disparities; prioritising those who prevent harm or mitigate disparities; recognising contributions to combating an outbreak; and treating similar individuals similarly. Ethically and equitably marshalling available countermeasures requires articulating these fundamental objectives, identifying priority tiers, and recognising trade-offs between prioritising the people at the highest risk of infection and the people at the highest risk of harm if infected. These five values can provide guidance on preferable priority categories for a more ethically sound response and suggest methods for optimising allocation of countermeasures for mpox and other diseases for which countermeasures are in short supply. Properly marshalling available countermeasures will be crucial for future effective and equitable national responses to outbreaks.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Monkeypox virus / Mpox Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Public Health Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Monkeypox virus / Mpox Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Public Health Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos