Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures.
Minckas, Nicole; Kharel, Rashmi; Ryan-Coker, Marcella; Lincetto, Ornella; Tunçalp, Özge; Sacks, Emma; Muzigaba, Moise; Portela, Anayda.
Afiliação
  • Minckas N; Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK nicole.minckas.16@ucl.ac.uk.
  • Kharel R; Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Ryan-Coker M; Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
  • Lincetto O; Deanery of Clinical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Tunçalp Ö; Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Sacks E; Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Muzigaba M; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Portela A; Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
BMJ Glob Health ; 8(Suppl 2)2023 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37160360
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Standardised measures on experience of care are essential to understanding the care women and newborns receive and to designing appropriate interventions and responses. This review builds on ongoing work in the realm of maternity care and complements it by reviewing existing tools and measures to assess experience of and satisfaction with the care of the newborn.

METHODS:

We conducted a scoping review of published literature to identify measures and tools of experience (physiological or indirect) and satisfaction with newborn care. We systematically searched five bibliographic databases from 1 January 2010 through 1 December 2022 and contacted professional networks. Using a predefined evidence template, we extracted data on the studies and the tools' characteristics. We mapped the tools and measures against the WHO quality of care frameworks to identify the most frequent measured domains of care and to highlight existing gaps.

RESULT:

We identified 18 292 records of which 72 were eligible. An innovative finding of this review is the inclusion of newborn perspectives through behavioural responses, physiological signals, pain profiles as well as other non-verbal cues as markers of newborn experience. Domains related to parental participation and decision-making, ensuring continuity of care and receiving coordinated care, were the most measured across the included tools.

CONCLUSION:

Comprehensive and validated instruments measuring all aspects of care are needed. Developing a robust theoretical ground will be fundamental to the design and utilisation of standardised tools and measures. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION DETAILS This review was registered and published on protocol.io (dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bvk7n4zn).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços de Saúde Materna Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Glob Health Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços de Saúde Materna Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Glob Health Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido