Photon-Counting Versus Energy-Integrating Detector CT Angiography of the Lower Extremity in a Human Cadaveric Model With Continuous Extracorporeal Perfusion.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Detailed visualization of the arterial runoff is mandatory for the assessment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease. This study aims to compare the performance of a first-generation photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) to a third-generation energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography angiographies of 8 upper leg arterial runoffs were performed on human cadaveric models with continuous extracorporeal perfusion. For both PCD-CT and EID-CT, radiation dose-equivalent 120 kVp acquisition protocols (low-/medium-/high-dose CTDI Vol = 3/5/10 mGy) were used. All scans were performed with standard collimation (PCD-CT 144 × 0.4 mm; EID-CT 96 × 0.6 mm), a pitch factor of 0.4, and a gantry rotation time of 1.0 second. Reformatting of data included the use of comparable vascular kernels (Bv 48/49), a slice thickness and increment of 1.0 mm, and a field of view of 150 × 150 mm. Eight radiologists evaluated image quality independently using a browser-based pairwise forced-choice comparison setup. Kendall concordance coefficient ( W ) was calculated to estimate interrater agreement. Signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared based on 1-way analyses of variance and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Low-dose PCD-CT achieved superior signal-to-noise ratio/CNR values compared with high-dose EID-CT ( P < 0.001). Linear regression analysis suggested that an EID-CT scan with a CTDI Vol of at least 15.5 mGy was required to match the CNR value of low-dose PCD-CT. Intraluminal contrast attenuation was higher in PCD-CT than EID-CT, irrespective of dose level (415.0 ± 31.9 HU vs 329.2 ± 29.4 HU; P < 0.001). Subjective image quality of low-dose PCD-CT was considered superior to high-dose EID-CT ( P < 0.001). Interrater agreement was high ( W = 0.989). CONCLUSIONS: Using cadaveric models with continuous extracorporeal perfusion allows for intraindividual image quality comparisons between PCD-CT and EID-CT on variable dose levels. With superior luminal contrast attenuation and denoising in angiographies of the peripheral arterial runoff, PCD-CT displayed potential for radiation saving of up to 83% compared with EID-CT.