Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comprehensive Cost Implications of Commercially Available Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening Modalities.
Allen, Casey J; Bloom, Nathan; Rothka, Michael; Rao, Pavan; Wagner, Patrick L; Bartlett, David L; Farah, Katie; Chalikonda, Sricharan.
Afiliação
  • Allen CJ; From the Institute of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, (Allen, Rao, Wagener, Chalikonda).
  • Bloom N; Right Care Administration, Highmark Health, Pittsburgh, PA (Bloom, Rothka).
  • Rothka M; Right Care Administration, Highmark Health, Pittsburgh, PA (Bloom, Rothka).
  • Rao P; From the Institute of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, (Allen, Rao, Wagener, Chalikonda).
  • Wagner PL; From the Institute of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, (Allen, Rao, Wagener, Chalikonda).
  • Bartlett DL; Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA (Bartlett).
  • Farah K; Institute of Medicine, Division of Gastrointestinal Diseases, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA (Farah).
  • Chalikonda S; From the Institute of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, (Allen, Rao, Wagener, Chalikonda).
J Am Coll Surg ; 237(3): 465-472, 2023 09 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37219020
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There is an increasing usage of noninvasive screening modalities for colorectal cancer (CRC), primarily the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and multi-target stool DNA test (Cologuard [CG]). The aim of this study was to determine the comprehensive, long-term cost implications of these noninvasive screening modalities. STUDY

DESIGN:

Using a national insurer-based administrative dataset, patients screened for CRC from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 were analyzed. A hierarchical logic system was used to determine the primary screening modality for each patient. The total annual costs in US dollars ($) were extrapolated using number of patients screened, costs per test, screening intervals, and costs incurred from false results. Patients within our tumor registry diagnosed with CRC were matched to their claims data, and cancer stage distribution was compared.

RESULTS:

Of 119,334 members who underwent noninvasive screening, 38.1% underwent screening with FIT and 40.0% with CG. The combined annual cost for these 2 screening modalities was $13.7 million. By transitioning to FIT alone for all noninvasive screening, the total annual cost would decrease to $7.9 million, resulting in a savings of approximately $5.8 million per year. Additionally, by combining data from the network cancer registry and insurer-based claims dataset, we were able to match 533 individuals who underwent screening and were later diagnosed with CRC. The rate of early-stage (stage 0 to II) disease was found to be similar between those screened with FIT and CG (59.5% FIT vs 63.2% CG; p = 0.77).

CONCLUSIONS:

The adoption of FIT as the primary noninvasive CRC screening method has the potential to generate significant cost savings, and therefore, carries significant value implications for a large population health system.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Screening_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Surg Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Screening_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Surg Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article