Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Model for Evaluating Total Costs of Care and Cost Savings of Specialty Condition-Based Care for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis in an Integrated Practice Unit.
Jayakumar, Prakash; Mills, Zachary; Triana, Brian; Moxham, Jamie; Olmstead, Todd; Wallace, Scott; Bozic, Kevin; Koenig, Karl.
Afiliação
  • Jayakumar P; Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care. University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School. Austin, TX, USA. Electronic address: prakash.jayakumar@austin.utexas.edu.
  • Mills Z; Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care. University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School. Austin, TX, USA.
  • Triana B; Duke University Health Systems, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Moxham J; Department of Analytics and Health Economics. Ascension Seton. Austin, TX, USA.
  • Olmstead T; Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
  • Wallace S; Value Institute for Health and Care. University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
  • Bozic K; Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care. University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School. Austin, TX, USA.
  • Koenig K; Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care. University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School. Austin, TX, USA.
Value Health ; 26(9): 1363-1371, 2023 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37236394
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The viability of specialty condition-based care via integrated practice units (IPUs) requires a comprehensive understanding of total costs of care. Our primary objective was to introduce a model to evaluate costs and potential costs savings using time-driven activity-based costing comparing IPU-based nonoperative management with traditional nonoperative management and IPU-based operative management with traditional operative management for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA). Secondarily, we assess drivers of incremental cost differences between IPU-based care and traditional care. Finally, we model potential cost savings through diverting patients from traditional operative management to IPU-based nonoperative management.

METHODS:

We developed a model to evaluate costs using time-driven activity-based costing for hip and knee OA care pathways within a musculoskeletal IPU compared with traditional care. We identified differences in costs and drivers of cost differences and developed a model to demonstrate potential cost savings through diverting patients from operative intervention.

RESULTS:

Weighted average costs of IPU-based nonoperative management were lower than traditional nonoperative management and lower in IPU-based operative management than traditional operative management. Key drivers of incremental cost savings included care led by surgeons in partnership with associate providers, modified physical therapy programs with self-management, and judicious use of intra-articular injections. Substantial savings were modeled by diverting patients toward IPU-based nonoperative management.

CONCLUSIONS:

Costing models involving musculoskeletal IPUs demonstrate favorable costs and cost savings compared with traditional management of hip or knee OA. More effective team-based care and utilization of evidence-based nonoperative strategies can drive the financial viability of these innovative care models.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoartrite do Quadril / Osteoartrite do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Value Health Assunto da revista: FARMACOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoartrite do Quadril / Osteoartrite do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Value Health Assunto da revista: FARMACOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article