Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Survey of young women with breast cancer to identify rates of fertility preservation (FP) discussion and barriers to FP care.
Sauerbrun-Cutler, May-Tal; Pandya, Sonali; Recabo, Olivia; Raker, Christina; Clark, Melissa A; Robison, Katina.
Afiliação
  • Sauerbrun-Cutler MT; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital, 90 Plain Street, Providence, RI, 02905, USA. msauerbruncutle@wihri.org.
  • Pandya S; Breast Oncology at Sanofi Genzyme, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Recabo O; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
  • Raker C; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
  • Clark MA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
  • Robison K; Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 40(8): 2003-2011, 2023 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37329421
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To identify the proportion of reproductive age women with breast cancer that engaged in a fertility preservation discussion and reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) consultation.

METHODS:

This cross-sectional survey recruited women 18-42 years who were diagnosed with breast cancer from 2006 to 2016 by phone or email and asked them to complete an online survey. Demographic characteristics, barriers to FP, utilization of FP consultation, and FP procedures (oocyte and embryo cryopreservation) were analyzed.

RESULTS:

A majority of women (64%) did not have FP discussed by any provider. Older women and those who were parents at the time of diagnosis were less likely to engage in a FP discussion. However, there were no significant differences in partner status or cancer stage between women with or without FP discussions. Of the women who desired future children prior to the cancer diagnosis, 93% received chemotherapy; however, only 34% of these women had a consultation with an REI. The most common reasons for declining FP consultation were already having their desired number of children (41%), financial barriers (14%), and concern about delaying cancer treatment and cancer recurrence (12%). Forty percent of women who desired future children and met with an REI pursued FP procedures.

CONCLUSION:

Younger women were more likely to receive FP counseling. FP consultations and procedures were low even in women who desired future fertility, with the predominant barriers being cost, fears concerning a delay in cancer treatment, and future cancer recurrence.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Preservação da Fertilidade / Infertilidade / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Assist Reprod Genet Assunto da revista: GENETICA / MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Preservação da Fertilidade / Infertilidade / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Assist Reprod Genet Assunto da revista: GENETICA / MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos