Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Total neoadjuvant therapy versus standard neoadjuvant treatment strategies for the management of locally advanced rectal cancer: network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Donnelly, Mark; Ryan, Odhrán K; Ryan, Éanna J; Creavin, Ben; O'Reilly, Mary; McDermott, Ray; Kennelly, Rory; Hanly, Ann; Martin, Seán T; Winter, Des C.
Afiliação
  • Donnelly M; Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Ryan OK; School of Medicine, University College, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Ryan ÉJ; Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Creavin B; School of Medicine, University College, Dublin, Ireland.
  • O'Reilly M; Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • McDermott R; Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Kennelly R; Department of Oncology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Hanly A; School of Medicine, University College, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Martin ST; Department of Oncology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Winter DC; Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Br J Surg ; 110(10): 1316-1330, 2023 09 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37330950
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study compared the advantages and disadvantages of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) strategies for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, compared with the more traditional multimodal neoadjuvant management strategies of long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) or short-course radiotherapy (SCRT).

METHODS:

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of exclusively RCTs was undertaken, comparing survival, recurrence, pathological, radiological, and oncological outcomes. The last date of the search was 14 December 2022.

RESULTS:

In total, 15 RCTs involving 4602 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, conducted between 2004 and 2022, were included. TNT improved overall survival compared with LCRT (HR 0.73, 95 per cent credible interval 0.60 to 0.92) and SCRT (HR 0.67, 0.47 to 0.95). TNT also improved rates of distant metastasis compared with LCRT (HR 0.81, 0.69 to 0.97). Reduced overall recurrence was observed for TNT compared with LCRT (HR 0.87, 0.76 to 0.99). TNT showed an improved pCR compared with both LCRT (risk ratio (RR) 1.60, 1.36 to 1.90) and SCRT (RR 11.32, 5.00 to 30.73). TNT also showed an improvement in cCR compared with LCRT (RR 1.68, 1.08 to 2.64). There was no difference between treatments in disease-free survival, local recurrence, R0 resection, treatment toxicity or treatment compliance.

CONCLUSION:

This study provides further evidence that TNT has improved survival and recurrence benefits compared with current standards of care, and may increase the number of patients suitable for organ preservation, without negatively influencing treatment toxicity or compliance.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Terapia Neoadjuvante Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Surg Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Terapia Neoadjuvante Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Surg Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irlanda