Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Gender Bias Through Autonomy During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy at a Rural Community General Surgery Residency Program.
Biller, Jessica; Simunich, Thomas; Morrissey, Shawna; Dumire, Russell.
Afiliação
  • Biller J; Department of Surgery, Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center, Johnstown, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: jessibille@gmail.com.
  • Simunich T; Department of Research, Duke LifePoint Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center, Johnstown, Pennsylvania.
  • Morrissey S; Department of Surgery, Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center, Johnstown, Pennsylvania.
  • Dumire R; Department of Surgery, Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center, Johnstown, Pennsylvania.
J Surg Educ ; 80(11): 1508-1515, 2023 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37353421
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Gender bias not only continues to exist in surgical specialties, but in the medical field overall. Despite females graduating from medical schools at the same rate as men, a discrepancy still exists in the number of females pursuing surgical specialties compared to their male counterparts. We hypothesized that surgical training occurring in smaller institutions with close-knit relationships between faculty and residents should decrease the likelihood of gender bias towards females, as measured by perceived autonomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

DESIGN:

All 17 surgery residents at a community surgery residency program were asked to voluntarily and anonymously complete an investigator-created questionnaire after every laparoscopic cholecystectomy from October 2020 to May 2022. The questionnaire included details regarding overall resident operative experience, case complexity, patient diagnosis, resident autonomy throughout the case, and perceived autonomy compared to their peers. Each respondent estimated their percent autonomy from 0% to 100% during 5 distinct portions of the case, from which, a mean overall percent autonomy was calculated.

RESULTS:

A total of 233 questionnaires (98 female, 135 male) were completed during the study period, with 8 females and 9 males in the first study year and 7 females and 10 males in the second. Mean overall autonomy was statistically similar between males and females, 71% and 72% respectively (p = 0.967). Case difficulty was not statistically different between males and females (p = 0.445). There was a significant difference in autonomy of all residents with male and female attendings, 67.5% and 80.3%, respectively (p = 0.001), however this did not differ between male and female residents. Eighty-three percent of respondents felt that their level of autonomy was acceptable for their postgraduate year (PGY) level. Over 90 percent of respondents felt their autonomy was not affected by their gender.

CONCLUSIONS:

There was no significant difference in perceived autonomy between male and female residents during laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our small general surgery residency program. Gender bias did not appear to be a prohibiting factor in the amount of autonomy given to male and female residents.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cirurgia Geral / Colecistectomia Laparoscópica / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Educ Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cirurgia Geral / Colecistectomia Laparoscópica / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Educ Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article